• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯方法在 SF-6D 健康状态偏好模型中的应用。

Use of Bayesian methods to model the SF-6D health state preference based data.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, P.O.BOX: 11-0236, Riad El Solh 1107-2020, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 18;16(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1068-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-018-1068-7
PMID:30563528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6299638/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, models used for health state valuation data have been frequentists. Recently a number of researchers have investigated the use of Bayesian methods in this area. The aim of this paper is to put on the map of modelling a new approach to estimating SF-6D health state utility values using Bayesian methods. This will help health care professionals in deriving better health state utilities of the original UK SF-6D for their specialized applications.

METHODS

The valuation study is composed of 249 SF-6D health states valued by a representative sample of the UK population using the standard gamble technique. Throughout this paper, we present four different models, including one simple linear regression model and three random effect models. The predictive ability of these models is assessed by comparing predicted and observed mean SF-6D scores, R/adjusted R and RMSE. All analyses were carried out using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation methods freely available in the specialist software WinBUGS.

RESULTS

The random effects model with interaction model performs best under all criterions, with mean predicted error of 0.166, R/adjusted R of 0.683 and RMSE of 0.218.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bayesian models provide flexible approaches to estimate mean SF-6D utility estimates, including characterizing the full range of uncertainty inherent in these estimates. We hope that this work will provide applied researchers with a practical set of tools to appropriately model outcomes in cost-effectiveness analysis.

摘要

背景

传统上,用于健康状态估值数据的模型是频率主义者。最近,许多研究人员已经在该领域研究了贝叶斯方法的应用。本文的目的是在建模中引入一种新方法,即用贝叶斯方法估计 SF-6D 健康状态效用值。这将帮助医疗保健专业人员为其特定应用从原始英国 SF-6D 中得出更好的健康状态效用。

方法

估值研究由 249 个 SF-6D 健康状态组成,这些健康状态由英国代表性人群使用标准博弈技术进行评估。在本文中,我们提出了四个不同的模型,包括一个简单的线性回归模型和三个随机效应模型。通过比较预测和观察到的平均 SF-6D 得分、R/调整 R 和 RMSE,评估这些模型的预测能力。所有分析均使用专家软件 WinBUGS 中免费提供的贝叶斯马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)模拟方法进行。

结果

具有交互模型的随机效应模型在所有标准下表现最佳,平均预测误差为 0.166,R/调整 R 为 0.683,RMSE 为 0.218。

结论

贝叶斯模型为估计平均 SF-6D 效用估计值提供了灵活的方法,包括描述这些估计值中固有的全部不确定性范围。我们希望这项工作将为应用研究人员提供一套实用的工具,以适当建模成本效益分析中的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/7a313a402a80/12955_2018_1068_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/3d7be0c394d5/12955_2018_1068_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/404e5e10bd01/12955_2018_1068_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/7a313a402a80/12955_2018_1068_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/3d7be0c394d5/12955_2018_1068_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/404e5e10bd01/12955_2018_1068_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6f/6299638/7a313a402a80/12955_2018_1068_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Bayesian methods to model the SF-6D health state preference based data.贝叶斯方法在 SF-6D 健康状态偏好模型中的应用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 18;16(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1068-7.
2
Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep using a Bayesian framework.使用贝叶斯框架为 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-3L + Sleep 构建偏好指数模型。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1495-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02436-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
The Importance of Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty in SF-6D Value Sets and Its Impact on Studies that Use the SF-6D to Measure Health Utility.参数不确定性在 SF-6D 值集中的重要性及其对使用 SF-6D 衡量健康效用的研究的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3949. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113949.
4
Modelling SF-6D health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对SF-6D健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):597-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
Analysis of SF-6D Health State Utility Scores: Is Beta Regression Appropriate?SF-6D健康状态效用评分分析:贝塔回归是否适用?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 1;8(4):525. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040525.
6
Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.估算基于巴西人群的 SF-6D 值集。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.012.
7
Mapping chronic liver disease questionnaire scores onto SF-6D utility values in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者慢性肝病问卷评分与SF-6D效用值的映射关系
Qual Life Res. 2016 Apr;25(4):947-57. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1161-x. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
8
A comparison of Hong Kong and United Kingdom SF-6D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对香港和英国 SF-6D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 May 10.
9
The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.开发一种将 Neck Disability Index (NDI)转化为颈椎疾病成本效用分析中效用评分的模型。
Spine J. 2012 Jan;12(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
10
A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach for Modeling SF-6D Health State Utility Scores.贝叶斯非参数方法在 SF-6D 健康状态效用评分模型中的应用。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2022 Jan-Feb;27:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A proper reference metabolic equivalent value to assess physical activity intensity in Japanese female nurses.用于评估日本女护士身体活动强度的适当参考代谢当量值。
Womens Midlife Health. 2019 Sep 13;5:4. doi: 10.1186/s40695-019-0048-3. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to estimate EQ-5D utility scores from EORTC QLQ data in myeloma for use in cost-effectiveness analysis.使用贝叶斯马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法从骨髓瘤的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷(QLQ)数据中估计EQ-5D效用分数,以用于成本效益分析。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):351-60. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15575285.
2
Constructing indirect utility models: some observations on the principles and practice of mapping to obtain health state utilities.构建间接效用模型:关于映射获得健康状态效用的原则和实践的一些观察。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Aug;31(8):635-41. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0071-4.
3
Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: a comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease.
解决健康状况测量中的天花板效应:应用于艾滋病患者测量方法的技术比较
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):327-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00745.x.
4
Estimating a preference-based single index for the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) instrument from the SF-6D.基于SF-6D评估体重对生活质量影响简易量表(IWQOL-Lite)的偏好单指标。
Value Health. 2004 Jul-Aug;7(4):490-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.74012.x.
5
Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 Health Survey in a nationally representative sample.在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,根据SF-12健康调查预测欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQoL EQ-5D)偏好分数。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):160-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04264015.
6
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.基于SF-36量表对健康偏好测量值的估计。
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):271-92. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8.
7
Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.健康效用指数3系统的多属性和单属性效用函数
Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):113-28. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006.
8
The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life.生活质量评估(AQoL)工具:一种与健康相关生活质量的心理测量方法。
Qual Life Res. 1999 May;8(3):209-24. doi: 10.1023/a:1008815005736.
9
EuroQol: the current state of play.欧洲生活质量量表:当前进展情况
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
10
Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.多属性偏好函数。健康效用指数。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun;7(6):503-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005.