Suppr超能文献

[BOBCAT临床试验:关于计算机化纯音听力测定可靠性和有效性的首次报告]

[Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].

作者信息

Picard M, Ilecki H J, Baxter J D

机构信息

Université de Montréal, Qué., Canada.

出版信息

Audiology. 1988;27(4):234-46.

PMID:3056359
Abstract

Computerized diagnostic audiometry is quickly emerging as a viable productivity tool in the audiology clinic. To date, there has been little reported on its reliability and validity with the hearing-impaired. The 'Battery of Basic Computerized Audiometric Tests' (BOBCAT) is a computer program which puts a wide variety of clinical hearing tests under computer control. The purpose of the present study was to ascertain the reliability and validity of BOBCAT in the measurement of hearing sensitivity. A field study was conducted in a group of 92 workers exposed to noise to measure air- and bone-conduction thresholds. Coefficients of reliability of 0.85 and higher were obtained between air and bone thresholds for both methods of testing; that is, manual and computer-controlled audiometry. The same measurement between manual and computerized air-conduction pure-tone thresholds gave values ranging from 0.93 to 0.98. A principal-components analysis documented content validity of computerized audiometry. These results are interpreted as clear evidence of both reliability and validity of the BOBCAT procedure, with one exception: 6.7% of all observations are showing air-conduction computerized thresholds of -10 dB at one or more frequencies, with no confirmation by manual audiometry. This is attributed to insufficient randomization of intervals between stimuli, a problem which should be taken care of by new versions of the software.

摘要

计算机化诊断听力测定法正迅速成为听力诊所中一种可行的提高工作效率的工具。迄今为止,关于其在听力受损者中的可靠性和有效性的报道很少。“基本计算机化听力测试组合”(BOBCAT)是一个计算机程序,它将各种各样的临床听力测试置于计算机控制之下。本研究的目的是确定BOBCAT在听力敏感度测量中的可靠性和有效性。对一组92名接触噪声的工人进行了一项现场研究,以测量气导和骨导阈值。两种测试方法(即手动和计算机控制的听力测定法)在气导和骨导阈值之间获得的可靠性系数均为0.85及以上。手动和计算机化气导纯音阈值之间的相同测量值在0.93至0.98之间。主成分分析证明了计算机化听力测定法的内容效度。这些结果被解释为BOBCAT程序可靠性和有效性的明确证据,但有一个例外:所有观察结果中有6.7%显示在一个或多个频率上气导计算机化阈值为-10dB,而手动听力测定法未得到证实。这归因于刺激之间间隔的随机化不足,新版本的软件应解决这个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验