Cosgrove Melinda K, O'Brien Daniel J, Ramsey David S L
Wildlife Disease Laboratory, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI, United States.
Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Dec 4;5:306. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00306. eCollection 2018.
Although tuberculosis caused by (bTB) is endemic in white-tailed deer () in northeastern Michigan, USA, baiting and feeding of deer continue despite a regulatory ban. Previous modeling suggests aggregation at bait sites slows the rates at which harvest and/or vaccination decrease bTB prevalence, prolongs time to eradication, and increases the likelihood that once eradicated, bTB will re-establish following an incursion. However, the extent to which specific factors such as food density, attractiveness to deer, and persistence on the landscape influence bTB transmission is unknown. We used an individual-based, spatially-explicit stochastic simulation model of bTB in deer and cattle to investigate effects of feed density, attractiveness, and spatial and temporal persistence on bTB prevalence in deer and the probability of breakdowns in adjacent cattle herds. Because hunter harvest remains key to controlling bTB in deer, and harvest rates are in long term decline, we modeled these feeding-associated factors at harvest rates prevailing both when the model was developed (2003-2007) and in 2018. Food placement at randomized locations vs. fixed sites had little effect on bTB prevalence in deer, whereas increasing the probability that deer move to food piles (attractiveness) had the greatest effect of factors studied on both prevalence and herd breakdowns. Reducing food pile density reduced prevalence, but decreased herd breakdowns only modestly. Consistent availability of food over longer periods of time, as would occur with supplemental winter feeding or persistent recreational feeding, increased both prevalence in deer and cattle herd breakdowns dramatically. Though perhaps implausible to the public, altering how bait and feed for deer are used can reduce cattle herd breakdowns. Baiting and feeding bans have contributed to declining bTB prevalence, but non-compliance and continued legal sales of feed impede eradication. Requiring hunters to move food piles is unlikely to mitigate effects on transmission and is not a useful management tool. Compared to baiting, winter supplemental feeding or extended recreational feeding is likely to magnify bTB transmission by prolonging temporal availability. Because attractiveness of feed is influenced both by type of feed and deer behavior, research to quantify factors influencing deer movement to food should be a priority.
尽管由牛型结核分枝杆菌(bTB)引起的结核病在美国密歇根州东北部的白尾鹿中呈地方性流行,但尽管有监管禁令,对鹿的诱捕和投喂仍在继续。先前的模型表明,在诱饵地点的聚集减缓了狩猎和/或疫苗接种降低bTB流行率的速度,延长了根除时间,并增加了一旦根除后bTB在入侵后重新建立的可能性。然而,食物密度、对鹿的吸引力以及在景观中的持久性等特定因素对bTB传播的影响程度尚不清楚。我们使用了一个基于个体、空间明确的鹿和牛bTB随机模拟模型,来研究饲料密度、吸引力以及空间和时间持久性对鹿群中bTB流行率和相邻牛群中疫情爆发概率的影响。由于猎人狩猎仍然是控制鹿群中bTB的关键,且狩猎率长期下降,我们在模型开发时(2003 - 2007年)和2018年的现行狩猎率下对这些与投喂相关的因素进行了建模。在随机位置与固定地点放置食物对鹿群中bTB流行率影响不大,而增加鹿移动到食物堆的概率(吸引力)对所研究的流行率和牛群疫情爆发因素影响最大。降低食物堆密度降低了流行率,但对牛群疫情爆发的降低幅度较小。较长时间内食物的持续供应,如冬季补充投喂或持续的娱乐性投喂,会显著增加鹿群中的流行率和牛群疫情爆发。尽管对公众来说可能难以置信,但改变对鹿的诱饵和饲料使用方式可以减少牛群疫情爆发。诱饵和投喂禁令有助于降低bTB流行率,但违规行为和饲料的持续合法销售阻碍了根除工作。要求猎人移动食物堆不太可能减轻对传播的影响,也不是一个有用的管理工具。与诱饵相比,冬季补充投喂或延长的娱乐性投喂可能会通过延长时间可用性来放大bTB传播。由于饲料的吸引力受饲料类型和鹿的行为影响,量化影响鹿移动到食物的因素的研究应成为优先事项。