Al-Mamgani Abrahim, Navran Arash, Walraven Iris, Schreuder Willen Hans, Tesselaar Margot E T, Klop Willem Martin C
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):575-583. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5241-8. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
We aimed to analyze the oncological and functional outcomes of chemoradiation for T4 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.
Patients treated between 2008 and 2015 with chemoradiation (n = 39) were retrospectively analyzed for oncological and functional (laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival, LED-FS) outcomes and compared with 32 consecutive patients treated primarily with total laryngectomy (TL). LED was scored as event in case of local failure, TL for any reason, persistent tracheotomy and/or feeding tube dependency 2 years after chemoradiation.
The 5-year local control (LC) rates in the chemoradiation and TL groups were 64 and 87%, respectively (p = 0.030). The disease-free survival was 54 and 59% (p = 0.810), and overall survival (OS) was 46 and 47% (p = 1.00). In the chemoradiation group, the 5-year cumulative incidence of LED-FS was 46%, but was significantly worse in patients with poor pre-treatment laryngeal function, compared to those without (20% and 74%, respectively, p = 0.001). Furthermore, patients with LED have significantly worse OS compared to those without (32% and 65%, respectively, p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis showed that primary treatment type is significantly predictive for LC, while tumor site and extra-capsular extension were predictive for OS. Poor pre-treatment laryngeal function is the only significant predictive factor for LED.
TL resulted in significantly better LC, as compared to chemoradiation in T4 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients and the LED-FS is worse in patients with poor pre-treatment laryngeal function. These patients might benefit more from primary treatment with TL followed by radiotherapy. These issues should be taken into consideration, as patients are counseled about different primary treatment options.
我们旨在分析T4期喉癌和下咽癌放化疗的肿瘤学及功能学结局。
对2008年至2015年间接受放化疗的患者(n = 39)进行回顾性分析,评估其肿瘤学及功能学(无喉食管功能障碍生存期,LED - FS)结局,并与32例主要接受全喉切除术(TL)的连续患者进行比较。若发生局部失败、因任何原因行TL、放化疗2年后仍持续气管切开和/或依赖饲管,则将LED记为事件。
放化疗组和TL组的5年局部控制(LC)率分别为64%和87%(p = 0.030)。无病生存率分别为54%和59%(p = 0.810),总生存率(OS)分别为46%和47%(p = 1.00)。在放化疗组中,LED - FS的5年累积发生率为46%,但治疗前喉功能差的患者与无此情况的患者相比明显更差(分别为20%和74%,p = 0.001)。此外,发生LED的患者与未发生者相比,OS明显更差(分别为32%和65%,p = 0.041)。多因素分析显示,初始治疗类型对LC有显著预测作用,而肿瘤部位和包膜外侵犯对OS有预测作用。治疗前喉功能差是LED的唯一显著预测因素。
与T4期喉癌和下咽癌患者的放化疗相比,TL导致的LC明显更好,且治疗前喉功能差的患者LED - FS更差。这些患者可能从先接受TL再行放疗的初始治疗中获益更多。在向患者咨询不同的初始治疗方案时,应考虑这些问题。