Department of Internal Medicine, Sugawara Medical Clinic, Japan Physicians Association, 3-9-16 Shukujiimachi, Nerima-ku, Tokyo, Tokyo, 177-0041, Japan.
Japan Physicians Association, Tokyo, Japan.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Jun;19(3):299-311. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0313-0.
This post hoc subanalysis of the randomized Japanese Primary Prevention Project investigated whether once-daily low-dose aspirin versus no aspirin reduced the risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients aged ≥ 70 years with atherosclerotic risk factors.
Patients aged < 70 years (young-old) or ≥ 70 years (old) with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes participated between 2005 and 2007. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin once daily or no aspirin plus standard of care. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes plus nonfatal stroke and nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was a composite of the primary outcome plus transient ischemic attack, angina pectoris, and arteriosclerotic disease requiring medical or surgical intervention. Old (n = 7971) and young-old (n = 6493) patients were followed up for a median 5.02 years.
Aspirin did not reduce the risk of primary (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.74-1.16]; P = 0.50) or secondary (0.85 [0.70-1.04]; P = 0.11) outcomes in patients aged ≥ 70 years. In old men with high-density lipoprotein < 40 mg/dL, treatment with low-dose aspirin was associated with a reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint compared with the group not receiving aspirin (10/260 vs 22/250; HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.93]; P = 0.03). This subgroup was also found to contain significant larger proportions of patients with elevated body mass index, patients with diabetes mellitus, and smokers (P < 0.001). Old patients also showed differences in bleeding outcomes. Serious extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than in the non-aspirin-treated group (35 [0.88%] vs 18 [0.45%]; HR 1.96 [1.11-3.46]; P = 0.020). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non-aspirin-treated group (63 [1.58%] vs 18 [0.45%]; relative risk [RR] 3.5 [2.08-5.90]; P < 0.0001). Cerebral hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage) tended to occur more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non-aspirin-treated group (22 [0.55%] vs 11 [0.28%]; RR 2.01 [0.97-4.14]; P = 0.058). Cerebral hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in old patients than in young-old patients (33 [0.41%] vs 10 [0.15%]; HR 2.7 [1.34-5.53]; P = 0.0055). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in a slightly higher proportion of old patients compared with young-old patients (81 [1.02%] vs 53 [0.82%]; RR 1.2 [0.88-1.76]; P = 0.21).
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of the primary or secondary outcomes in old patients. Aspirin treatment may have reduced CVEs within a high CVE risk elderly population subgroup. Aspirin treatment in such a group requires caution, because of the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, severe extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization or transfusion, and gastrointestinal bleeding in old patients receiving aspirin therapy.
The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00225849].
本随机日本初级预防项目的事后亚组分析旨在研究每日低剂量阿司匹林与不使用阿司匹林相比,是否可以降低伴有动脉粥样硬化危险因素的年龄≥70 岁患者的心血管事件(CVE)风险。
2005 年至 2007 年期间,年龄<70 岁(年轻老年人)或≥70 岁(老年人)的高血压、血脂异常或糖尿病患者参与了研究。患者按 1:1 比例随机接受 100mg 肠溶阿司匹林每日一次或不使用阿司匹林加标准治疗。主要结局是心血管原因死亡加上非致死性中风和非致死性心肌梗死的复合结局。次要结局是主要结局加上短暂性脑缺血发作、心绞痛和需要医疗或手术干预的动脉粥样硬化性疾病的复合结局。老年(n=7971)和年轻老年人(n=6493)患者的中位随访时间为 5.02 年。
阿司匹林并未降低年龄≥70 岁患者的主要(风险比 [HR] 0.92 [95%置信区间 {CI} 0.74-1.16];P=0.50)或次要(0.85 [0.70-1.04];P=0.11)结局风险。在高密度脂蛋白<40mg/dL 的老年男性中,与不使用阿司匹林组相比,低剂量阿司匹林治疗与主要终点发生率降低相关(10/260 与 22/250;HR 0.44 [95%CI 0.20-0.93];P=0.03)。该亚组还发现包含显著更高比例的体重指数升高、糖尿病和吸烟者(P<0.001)的患者。老年患者也显示出出血结局的差异。需要输血或住院治疗的严重颅外出血在阿司匹林治疗组中比在非阿司匹林治疗组中更频繁发生(35 [0.88%] 与 18 [0.45%];HR 1.96 [1.11-3.46];P=0.020)。阿司匹林治疗组比非阿司匹林治疗组更频繁发生胃肠道出血(63 [1.58%] 与 18 [0.45%];相对风险 [RR] 3.5 [2.08-5.90];P<0.0001)。脑出血(颅内出血)在阿司匹林治疗组中比非阿司匹林治疗组更倾向于发生(22 [0.55%] 与 11 [0.28%];RR 2.01 [0.97-4.14];P=0.058)。与年轻老年人相比,老年患者脑出血的发生率更高(33 [0.41%] 与 10 [0.15%];HR 2.7 [1.34-5.53];P=0.0055)。与年轻老年人相比,老年患者的胃肠道出血发生率略高(81 [1.02%] 与 53 [0.82%];RR 1.2 [0.88-1.76];P=0.21)。
讨论/结论:阿司匹林并未降低老年患者的主要或次要结局风险。阿司匹林治疗可能降低了伴有高 CVE 风险的老年人群亚组的 CVE。由于阿司匹林治疗的老年患者颅内出血、严重需要住院或输血的颅外出血和胃肠道出血风险增加,因此此类患者的阿司匹林治疗需要谨慎。
该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册 [NCT00225849]。