Heart and Vascular Center, Essentia Health, Duluth, Minnesota.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;9(9):808-816. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1712.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. Although aspirin is recommended for secondary prevention of ASCVD, there was no difference in safety and effectiveness of aspirin dosed daily at 81 mg or 325 mg in the ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) randomized clinical trial. However, it is unknown whether differences by sex exist in the safety and effectiveness of the different aspirin doses.
To evaluate sex-specific differences in the safety and effectiveness of 2 aspirin doses in the ADAPTAPLE trial.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The ADAPTABLE study was an open-label, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial that randomly assigned participants with chronic, stable ASCVD to 81 mg vs 325 mg of aspirin daily. Using Cox proportional-hazard models, male and female participants were compared for outcomes. In addition, it was assessed whether sex was an effect modifier in the association between aspirin dose and outcomes. The ADAPTABLE trial was conducted at 40 medical centers and 1 health plan. Eligible patients were 18 years and older and had established ASCVD. Study data were analyzed from December 2021 to March 2024.
Patients received 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin daily for the secondary prevention of ASCVD.
The primary effectiveness outcomes included all-cause death and hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. The primary safety outcome was hospitalization for major bleeding requiring transfusion.
A total of 15 076 patients (median [IQR] age, 67.6 [60.7-73.6] years; 10 352 male [68.7%]) were followed up for a median (IQR) of 26.2 (19.0-34.9) months. Overall, 4724 (31.3%) were female, and 2307 of the female participants (48.8%) received aspirin 81 mg. Compared with males, female participants were younger (median [IQR] age, 66.3 [59.4-72.6] years vs 68.2 (61.4-73.9) years, less likely to self-report White race (3426 [72.5%] vs 8564 [82.7%]), more likely to smoke (564 [12.9%] vs 818 [8.4%]), and more likely to have a history of peripheral arterial disease (1179 [25.7%] vs 2314 [23.0%]). The primary effectiveness outcome of all-cause death and hospitalization for MI or stroke occurred in 379 female participants (8.1%) and 780 male participants (7.1%). There was no significant interaction by sex for the primary effectiveness end point between the 2 aspirin doses (female adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82-1.26 and male aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.23; P interaction term for sex = .74). During the trial, female participants had fewer revascularization procedures (237 [5.0%] vs 680 [6.6%]; aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92; P = .002) but had a higher risk of hospitalization for stroke (aHR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.27-2.33; P < .001). Among female participants, there was a slightly higher rate of bleeding in the 81-mg aspirin cohort compared with the 325-mg cohort (20 [0.83%] vs 13 [0.52%]; aHR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.04-4.70; P interaction term for sex = .07). There were no significant differences between female and male participants regarding aspirin dose adherence.
In this secondary analysis of the ADAPTABLE trial, there were no significant sex-specific differences in the effectiveness and safety of 2 aspirin doses for secondary prevention of ASCVD events.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697916.
动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病 (ASCVD) 仍然是美国发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管阿司匹林被推荐用于 ASCVD 的二级预防,但在 ADAPTABLE(阿司匹林剂量:评估益处和长期有效性的患者为中心试验)随机临床试验中,每日服用 81 毫克或 325 毫克阿司匹林在安全性和有效性方面没有差异。然而,尚不清楚不同剂量的阿司匹林在安全性和有效性方面是否存在性别差异。
评估 ADAPTABLE 试验中两种阿司匹林剂量在安全性和有效性方面的性别特异性差异。
设计、地点和参与者:ADAPTABLE 研究是一项开放性、实用、随机临床试验,将患有慢性、稳定的 ASCVD 的参与者随机分配至每日 81 毫克与 325 毫克阿司匹林。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,比较了男性和女性参与者的结局。此外,还评估了性别是否是阿司匹林剂量与结局之间关联的效应修饰因素。ADAPTABLE 试验在 40 个医疗中心和 1 个健康计划中进行。合格患者年龄为 18 岁及以上,且已确诊 ASCVD。研究数据于 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 3 月进行分析。
患者每日接受 81 毫克或 325 毫克阿司匹林用于 ASCVD 的二级预防。
主要有效性结局包括全因死亡和因心肌梗死 (MI) 或中风住院。主要安全性结局是因大出血需要输血而住院。
共有 15076 名患者(中位数 [IQR] 年龄,67.6 [60.7-73.6] 岁;10352 名男性 [68.7%])接受了中位数(IQR)为 26.2(19.0-34.9)个月的随访。总体而言,4724 名(31.3%)为女性,其中 2307 名女性参与者(48.8%)服用 81 毫克阿司匹林。与男性相比,女性参与者年龄更小(中位数 [IQR] 年龄,66.3 [59.4-72.6] 岁 vs 68.2(61.4-73.9)岁),白人种族的自我报告比例较低(3426 [72.5%] vs 8564 [82.7%]),吸烟的可能性更高(564 [12.9%] vs 818 [8.4%]),且更可能患有外周动脉疾病(1179 [25.7%] vs 2314 [23.0%])。379 名女性参与者(8.1%)和 780 名男性参与者(7.1%)发生了全因死亡和因 MI 或中风住院的主要有效性结局。在两种阿司匹林剂量之间,性别对主要有效性终点没有显著的交互作用(女性调整后的危险比 [aHR],1.01;95% CI,0.82-1.26 和男性 aHR,1.06;95% CI,0.91-1.23;P 交互项性别= 0.74)。在试验期间,女性参与者的血运重建手术较少(237 [5.0%] vs 680 [6.6%];aHR,0.79;95% CI,0.68-0.92;P=0.002),但中风住院风险更高(aHR,1.72;95% CI,1.27-2.33;P<0.001)。在女性参与者中,81 毫克阿司匹林组的出血率略高于 325 毫克阿司匹林组(20 [0.83%] vs 13 [0.52%];aHR,2.21;95% CI,1.04-4.70;P 性别交互项= 0.07)。在阿司匹林剂量依从性方面,女性和男性参与者之间没有显著差异。
在 ADAPTABLE 试验的这项二次分析中,两种阿司匹林剂量在二级预防 ASCVD 事件的有效性和安全性方面没有显著的性别特异性差异。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02697916。