Suppr超能文献

大错特错:范梅南和史密斯谈现象学。

Getting It Quite Wrong: Van Manen and Smith on Phenomenology.

机构信息

1 University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

2 University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2019 May;29(6):900-907. doi: 10.1177/1049732318817547. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

Abstract

Max van Manen and Jonathan Smith have recently had an exchange in Qualitative Health Research concerning their respective use of phenomenology. I welcome the attempt to get clearer on what phenomenology amounts to and I agree with van Manen that an overly arbitrary use of the term will lead to an erosion of the reputation of phenomenology. However, I think both of them are to blame for promoting various confusions concerning the nature of phenomenology. The aim of my article is to make some critical remarks concerning van Manen's and Smith's understanding of phenomenology and to suggest alternative resources for qualitative researchers interested in phenomenology.

摘要

马克斯·范梅南和乔纳森·史密斯最近在《定性研究》杂志上就各自对现象学的使用进行了交流。我欢迎他们试图更清楚地说明现象学的含义,我同意范梅南的观点,即对该术语的过度任意使用将导致现象学声誉的削弱。然而,我认为他们两个人都应该为推广各种关于现象学本质的混淆负责。本文的目的是对范梅南和史密斯对现象学的理解提出一些批评意见,并为对现象学感兴趣的定性研究者提供替代资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验