Stauss Harald M, Stangl Hubert, Clark Karen C, Kwitek Anne E, Lira Vitor A
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Department of Health and Human Physiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Physiol Rep. 2018 Dec;6(24):e13953. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13953.
Previously, we reported that cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) increases blood glucose levels and inhibits insulin secretion in anesthetized rats through afferent signaling. Since afferent signaling is also thought to mediate the therapeutic effects of VNS in patients with therapy-refractory epilepsy and major depression, the question arises if patients treated with VNS develop impaired glucose tolerance. Thus, we hypothesized that cervical VNS impairs glucose tolerance in conscious rats. Rats (n = 7) were instrumented with telemetric blood pressure sensors and right- or left-sided cervical vagal nerve stimulators (3 V, 5 Hz, 1 msec pulse duration, 1 h on 1 h off). Glucose tolerance tests (GTTs, 1.5 g dextrose/kg BW, i.p.) were performed after overnight fasting with the stimulators on or off (sham stimulation) in randomized order separated by 3-4 days. Overnight VNS did not alter mean levels of blood pressure or heart rate, but increased fasted blood glucose levels (140 ± 13 mg/dL vs. 109 ± 8 mg/dL, P < 0.05). The area under the blood glucose concentration curves of the GTTs was larger during VNS than sham stimulation (3499 ± 211 mg/dLh vs. 1810 ± 234 mg/dLh, P < 0.05). One hour into the GTTs, the serum insulin concentrations had decreased during VNS (-0.57 ± 0.25 ng/mL, P < 0.05) and increased during sham stimulation (+0.71 ± 0.15 ng/mL, P < 0.05) compared to the fasted baseline levels. These results demonstrate that chronic cervical VNS elevates fasted blood glucose levels and impairs glucose tolerance likely through inhibition of glucose-induced insulin release in conscious rats. It remains to be determined if patients treated with VNS are at greater risk of developing glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes.
此前,我们报道过,在麻醉大鼠中,颈迷走神经刺激(VNS)通过传入信号增加血糖水平并抑制胰岛素分泌。由于传入信号也被认为介导了VNS对难治性癫痫和重度抑郁症患者的治疗作用,因此出现了一个问题,即接受VNS治疗的患者是否会出现糖耐量受损。因此,我们假设颈VNS会损害清醒大鼠的糖耐量。将大鼠(n = 7)植入遥测血压传感器以及右侧或左侧颈迷走神经刺激器(3V,5Hz,1毫秒脉冲持续时间,开1小时关1小时)。在过夜禁食后,以随机顺序在刺激器开启或关闭(假刺激)的情况下进行葡萄糖耐量试验(GTTs,1.5g葡萄糖/千克体重,腹腔注射),两次试验间隔3 - 4天。过夜VNS并未改变平均血压或心率水平,但空腹血糖水平升高(140±13mg/dL对109±8mg/dL,P < 0.05)。VNS期间GTTs的血糖浓度曲线下面积大于假刺激期间(3499±211mg/dL小时对1810±234mg/dL小时,P < 0.05)。在GTTs进行1小时后,与空腹基线水平相比,VNS期间血清胰岛素浓度下降(-0.57±0.25ng/mL,P < 0.05),假刺激期间血清胰岛素浓度升高(+0.71±0.15ng/mL,P < 0.05)。这些结果表明,慢性颈VNS会升高清醒大鼠的空腹血糖水平,并可能通过抑制葡萄糖诱导的胰岛素释放损害糖耐量。接受VNS治疗的患者是否有更高的发生糖耐量异常和2型糖尿病的风险仍有待确定。