Hou Jingyuan, Wu Heming, Zeng Xing, Rao Hui, Zhao Pingsen
Clinical Core Laboratory.
Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13660. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013660.
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a substantial public health problem and a leading cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate a commercially available loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the simultaneously detection of thirteen common lower respiratory pathogens in patients with respiratory symptoms. All participants age from 1 to 101 years old were recruited from inpatient or outpatient of Meizhou People's Hospital between October 2016 and March 2018. A total of 1767 sputum samples and 88 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with suspected LRTI were collected. For each sample, a parallel study using both routine bacterial culture-based and LAMP assays were carried out. In total, 810 (44.85%) out of the 1855 samples were found to be positive infected with respiratory pathogens by using the LAMP assays. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MecA) was the most predominant bacterial pathogens, with proportions of 17.09% in sputum and 10.23% bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples, respectively. The proportions of bacterial pathogen infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) (24.24%) was relatively high in aged <15 group (P <.001) while the proportions of bacterial pathogen infection with MecA (22.89%) was relatively high in aged >60 group (P <.001). Bacterial pathogen infection with MecA having the highest prevalence with proportions of 17.81% and 13.94% in male and female, respectively. A statistically higher proportion of male group had bacterial pathogen infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) in this study (P = .035). Comparison of results between the LAMP assay and culture method was conducted and our results indicated that there was higher detection rate by the LAMP assay than the bacterial culture method. Comparison of the results obtained with the LAMP assay and those obtained by sequencing analysis, when the sequencing method was set to 100%, demonstrating that the LAMP assay is 100% specific and 95.50% sensitive. The technique of LAMP assay was proved to be a simple, sensitive, specific, convenient, and rapid method, which can be implemented for diagnosing pathogenic bacteria in patients with LRTIs in primary labs without any need for expensive equipment or specialized techniques in resource-limited areas of China.
下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,也是全球范围内导致显著发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究的目的是评估一种市售的环介导等温扩增(LAMP)检测方法,用于同时检测有呼吸道症状患者的13种常见下呼吸道病原体。2016年10月至2018年3月期间,从梅州市人民医院的住院或门诊患者中招募了年龄在1至101岁之间的所有参与者。共收集了1767份疑似LRTI患者的痰液样本和88份支气管肺泡灌洗液样本。对于每个样本,同时进行了基于常规细菌培养和LAMP检测的平行研究。通过LAMP检测,在1855份样本中,共有810份(44.85%)被发现感染了呼吸道病原体呈阳性。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MecA)是最主要的细菌病原体,在痰液样本中的比例为17.09%,在支气管肺泡灌洗液样本中的比例为10.23%。<15岁年龄组中肺炎链球菌(Spn)细菌病原体感染比例相对较高(24.24%)(P<0.001),而>60岁年龄组中MecA细菌病原体感染比例相对较高(22.89%)(P<0.001)。MecA细菌病原体感染在男性中的患病率最高,分别为17.81%和13.94%。在本研究中,男性组中铜绿假单胞菌(Pae)细菌病原体感染的比例在统计学上更高(P=0.035)。对LAMP检测和培养方法的结果进行了比较,我们的结果表明,LAMP检测的检出率高于细菌培养方法。将LAMP检测结果与测序分析结果进行比较,当测序方法设定为100%时,表明LAMP检测具有100%的特异性和95.50%的敏感性。LAMP检测技术被证明是一种简单、灵敏、特异、方便且快速的方法,在中国资源有限地区的基层实验室中,无需任何昂贵设备或专门技术即可用于诊断LRTIs患者的病原菌。