Wu Guisheng, Fu Guanghua, Zhang Lei, Zhang Zongwang, Wang Xuxiang
Department of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13776. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013776.
Toxic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) on nervous, hepatorenal, and pulmonary systems might affect general anesthesia depth. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of NC on depth of total intravenous anesthesia.This prospective observational study enrolled 60 patients undergoing elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil (January-June 2015; Liaocheng People's Hospital, China): the NC group (n = 30) received NC, while the control group (n = 30) did not. Propofol and remifentanil dosages were adjusted according to indexes of consciousness (IoC1: sedation; IoC2: analgesia) to control fluctuations of blood pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline values. Parameters reflecting propofol/remifentanil dosages, intraoperative adverse events, and quality of anesthetic recovery were recorded.The duration of propofol infusion (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.5 hours, P < .05), mean propofol dosage (8.0 ± 1.0 vs 9.3 ± 1.5 mg kg h, P < .05), and adjustment frequency of target-controlled remifentanil infusion (2.9 ± 1.8 vs 4.4 ± 2.6 times/surgery, P < .05) were significantly lower in the NC group than in the control group; adjustment frequency of target-controlled propofol infusion was also numerically lower (2.0 ± 1.1 vs 2.7 ± 1.5 times/surgery, P = .053). Duration of remifentanil infusion, mean remifentanil dosage, voluntary eye opening, extubation time, and recovery score were not significantly different between groups. The incidence of tachycardia was lower in the NC group than in the control group (7.1% vs 37.0%, P < .05), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of total adverse events between groups.NC can enhance the sensitivity of breast cancer patients to the anesthetic effect of propofol.
新辅助化疗(NC)对神经、肝肾及肺部系统的毒性作用可能会影响全身麻醉深度。本研究旨在评估NC对全凭静脉麻醉深度的影响。这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了60例行择期单侧改良根治性乳房切除术的患者,手术期间采用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼进行全凭静脉麻醉(2015年1月至6月;中国聊城市人民医院):NC组(n = 30)接受NC,而对照组(n = 30)未接受。根据意识指标(IoC1:镇静;IoC2:镇痛)调整丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼剂量,以将血压和心率波动控制在基线值的20%以内。记录反映丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼剂量、术中不良事件及麻醉恢复质量的参数。丙泊酚输注持续时间(1.3±0.4 vs 1.8±0.5小时,P <.05)、丙泊酚平均剂量(8.0±1.0 vs 9.3±1.5 mg·kg·h,P <.05)以及靶控瑞芬太尼输注的调整频率(2.9±1.8 vs 4.4±2.6次/手术,P <.05)在NC组显著低于对照组;靶控丙泊酚输注的调整频率在数值上也较低(2.0±1.1 vs 2.7±1.5次/手术,P = 0.053)。瑞芬太尼输注持续时间、瑞芬太尼平均剂量、自主睁眼、拔管时间及恢复评分在两组间无显著差异。NC组心动过速发生率低于对照组(7.1% vs 37.0%,P <.05),但两组间总不良事件发生率无显著差异。NC可增强乳腺癌患者对丙泊酚麻醉效果的敏感性。