• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 RADNER 阅读图表测量健康眼最佳矫正 ETDRS 远视力时的基础阅读视力和速度的年龄相关性变化。

Age-related changes in baseline reading acuity and speed as measured using RADNER Reading Charts in healthy eyes with best corrected ETDRS distance acuity.

机构信息

Austrian Academy of Ophthalmology, Vienna, Austria

Department of Development Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;103(10):1518-1523. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313384. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313384
PMID:30573497
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess age-related differences in baseline measures of reading performance obtained from the RADNER Reading Charts in healthy eyes with best corrected (ETDRS) distance acuity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of participants (n=200) aged 25-74 years (n=20 per 5 years age group). Best corrected distance visual acuity was measured monocularly with ETDRS 2000 Charts. Reading performance was evaluated binocularly with the RADNER Reading Charts. Reading acuity (RA), reading acuity score (RA score), mean reading speed (MEAN-RS), maximum reading speed, reading speed with a long paragraph, critical print size (CPS) and the logMAR/logRAD ratio were analysed.

RESULTS

RA, RA score, CPS-1 (last logRAD with normal reading speed) and ETDRS acuity did not change significantly between age 25 and 54 years. Overall, the mean RA was -0.091±0.07 logRAD, and the RA score was -0.069±0.07 logRAD. The mean difference between the RA and best ETDRS acuity was 0.0603±0.055 logMAR (r=0.62; p<0.05). The logMAR/logRAD ratio was 87.75%±11.23%. The MEAN-RS ranged from 189±21.9 words per minute (wpm) for the group aged 70-74 years to 236±22.5 wpm for the group aged 40-44 years and correlated well with the long paragraph results (r=0.87).

CONCLUSION

Best corrected RA, reading speed and ETDRS distance acuity were constant until the age of 54 years. An age-related break point was found between the groups aged 50-54 years and 55-59 years; for reading speed, the break point can be assumed to be within the age range of 50-54 years.

摘要

目的

评估在年龄相关的阅读表现方面的差异,这些差异是从健康眼睛的基线测量中获得的,最佳矫正(ETDRS)远视力。

方法

对 25-74 岁的 200 名参与者(每组 20 人,每 5 岁为一组)进行了一项横断面研究。单眼使用 ETDRS 2000 图表测量最佳矫正远视力。双眼使用 RADNER 阅读图表评估阅读表现。分析阅读视力(RA)、阅读视力得分(RA 得分)、平均阅读速度(MEAN-RS)、最大阅读速度、长段落阅读速度、临界印刷尺寸(CPS)和 logMAR/logRAD 比值。

结果

25-54 岁之间,RA、RA 得分、CPS-1(最后一个以正常阅读速度阅读的 logRAD)和 ETDRS 视力均无显著变化。总体而言,平均 RA 为-0.091±0.07 logRAD,RA 得分为-0.069±0.07 logRAD。RA 与最佳 ETDRS 视力之间的平均差异为 0.0603±0.055 logMAR(r=0.62;p<0.05)。logMAR/logRAD 比值为 87.75%±11.23%。MEAN-RS 范围从 70-74 岁组的 189±21.9 个单词每分钟(wpm)到 40-44 岁组的 236±22.5 wpm,与长段落结果相关性良好(r=0.87)。

结论

最佳矫正 RA、阅读速度和 ETDRS 远视力在 54 岁之前保持不变。在 50-54 岁和 55-59 岁组之间发现了与年龄相关的转折点;对于阅读速度,转折点可以假定在 50-54 岁的年龄范围内。

相似文献

1
Age-related changes in baseline reading acuity and speed as measured using RADNER Reading Charts in healthy eyes with best corrected ETDRS distance acuity.使用 RADNER 阅读图表测量健康眼最佳矫正 ETDRS 远视力时的基础阅读视力和速度的年龄相关性变化。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;103(10):1518-1523. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313384. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
Determinants of Reading Performance in Eyes with Foveal-Sparing Geographic Atrophy.黄斑保留型地图样萎缩眼中阅读能力的决定因素
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Mar;3(3):201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
INTERSESSION REPEATABILITY OF READING PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者阅读表现测量的间歇可重复性。
Retina. 2024 Apr 1;44(4):707-713. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004015.
4
[A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed].[一种用于同时测定阅读视力和阅读速度的新阅读图表]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Sep;213(3):174-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034969.
5
Font effects on reading parameters: comparing Radner Reading Charts printed in Helvetica and Times Roman.字体对阅读参数的影响:对比使用 Helvetica 和 Times Roman 字体印刷的 Radner 阅读图表。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3387-3394. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05665-y. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Age-related course of visual acuity obtained with ETDRS 2000 charts in persons with healthy eyes.使用ETDRS 2000视力表在健康眼睛人群中获得的与年龄相关的视力变化过程。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;257(6):1295-1301. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04320-3. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Influence of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratectomy on patients' reading performance.准分子原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术对患者阅读能力的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Aug;31(8):1544-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.01.034.
8
Reading performance of monofocal pseudophakic patients with and without glasses under normal and dim light conditions.单焦点人工晶状体眼患者在正常和暗光条件下不戴镜和戴镜时的阅读表现。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Mar;40(3):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.054. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Reliability testing of the Dutch version of the Radner Reading Charts.荷兰版拉德纳阅读图表的可靠性测试。
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 May;85(5):353-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bf58b.
10
Integrating a novel concept of sentence optotypes into the RADNER Reading Charts.将句子视标这一新概念整合到拉德纳阅读视力表中。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;101(3):239-243. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309467. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The STArgardt Remofuscin Treatment Trial (STARTT): design and baseline characteristics of enrolled Stargardt patients.斯塔加特视网膜营养不良雷莫夫辛治疗试验(STARTT):入组的斯塔加特病患者的设计与基线特征
Open Res Eur. 2022 Sep 27;1:96. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13872.3. eCollection 2021.
2
Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study.使用兰多尔特环校准视力表的潜在局限性:一项微观研究。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Aug 15;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5.
3
Font effects on reading parameters: comparing Radner Reading Charts printed in Helvetica and Times Roman.
字体对阅读参数的影响:对比使用 Helvetica 和 Times Roman 字体印刷的 Radner 阅读图表。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3387-3394. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05665-y. Epub 2022 Apr 26.