a 1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA, USA.
b 2 Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Cambridge Health Alliance , Somerville , MA, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(5):811-817. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1544644. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Adolescent substance use has been linked to numerous adverse health, social, and educational outcomes. While there have been intensive resources placed in school-based prevention programs, the association of these policies on prevention outcomes is still unclear. State variation in policies provides an opportunity to assess the influence of school-based prevention programs.
To examine the association between the strength of state high school-based prevention programing and the prevalence of substance use disorders among adolescents ages 14-17 in the United States.
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data with state-level identifiers were merged with National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE) information on school-based prevention policy strength, categorized into "required," "recommended," and "no policy." Unadjusted comparisons and multilevel random intercept linear regression models were estimated to assess the change in rates of substance abuse or dependence from pre- to post- policy implementation, accounting for the nesting of individuals within states.
Rates of alcohol and tobacco abuse/dependence were significantly lower in states that required an alcohol prevention curriculum. After covariate adjustment, rates of alcohol abuse/dependence remained significantly lower in those states.
Reinforcing alcohol prevention messaging in school appears to have a modest association with decreased rates of adolescent alcohol use disorders, possibly in part due to a different approach to the curriculum. For other substances, policy requirements appear to be less effective in reducing the prevalence of adolescent substance use disorders, suggesting that more targeted messaging with higher-risk students may be required.
青少年物质使用与许多不良健康、社会和教育结果有关。虽然已经投入了大量资源用于学校预防计划,但这些政策对预防效果的关联仍不清楚。各州政策的差异为评估基于学校的预防计划的影响提供了机会。
研究美国 14-17 岁青少年物质使用障碍的流行率与州高中预防计划力度之间的关联。
国家毒品使用和健康调查 (NSDUH) 数据与州级识别码与国家教育委员会协会 (NASBE) 关于基于学校的预防政策力度的信息合并,分为“要求”、“推荐”和“无政策”。采用未调整的比较和多层次随机截距线性回归模型来评估政策实施前后物质滥用或依赖率的变化,同时考虑个体在各州内的嵌套情况。
要求开设酒精预防课程的州的酒精和烟草滥用/依赖率显著降低。在进行协变量调整后,这些州的酒精滥用/依赖率仍然显著降低。
在学校加强酒精预防信息宣传似乎与青少年酒精使用障碍率的降低有一定关联,这可能部分归因于课程的不同方法。对于其他物质,政策要求似乎对降低青少年物质使用障碍的流行率效果不大,这表明可能需要针对高风险学生进行更有针对性的宣传。