Lynch D M, Briggman J, Borden K, Fritsche H, Malkin A
Diagnostics Division, Abbott Laboratories, Ill.
Tumour Biol. 1988;9(5):270-80. doi: 10.1159/000217571.
The Abbott CEA-EIA Monoclonal One-Step procedure was evaluated and compared to the Abbott CEA-EIA Monoclonal, a two-step assay. The reproducibility, sensitivity, recovery and dilution linearity were similar for both assays. Excellent correlations were found between the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values obtained with these assays for healthy donors (n = 261, r = 0.951), patients with benign diseases (n = 171, r = 0.994) and cancer patients (n = 585, r = 0.997). In serial monitoring studies, one-step CEA values paralleled the CEA values determined with the two-step assay regardless of the type of cancer. The advantages of the one-step CEA assay over the two-step assay include significant reduction in both attended and total assay times, reduced sample volume, dry antibody-coated beads, color-coded reagents and an extended range for the standard curve. These test improvements were achieved without affecting the reproducibility, sensitivity and accuracy of the CEA measurement.
对雅培癌胚抗原酶免疫分析单克隆一步法进行了评估,并与两步法的雅培癌胚抗原酶免疫分析单克隆法进行了比较。两种检测方法的重复性、灵敏度、回收率和稀释线性相似。对于健康供体(n = 261,r = 0.951)、良性疾病患者(n = 171,r = 0.994)和癌症患者(n = 585,r = 0.997),用这些检测方法获得的癌胚抗原(CEA)值之间存在极好的相关性。在连续监测研究中,无论癌症类型如何,一步法CEA值与两步法测定的CEA值平行。一步法CEA检测相对于两步法检测的优点包括显著减少了有人值守的检测时间和总检测时间、减少了样本体积、采用干抗体包被珠、颜色编码试剂以及标准曲线范围扩大。这些检测改进在不影响CEA测量的重复性、灵敏度和准确性的情况下得以实现。