Department of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011-2271, United States.
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019 Mar 15;539:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.025. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
In this manuscript we examine the stability of an evaporating-unbounded axisymmetric liquid bridge confined between parallel-planar similar or chemically different substrates using both theory and experiments. With a quasistatic assumption we use hydrostatics to estimate the minimum stable volume V via the Young-Laplace equation for Bond numbers 0⩽Bo⩽1, and top/bottom wall contact angles 5°<θ<175° although the primary focus is on wetting and partial wetting fluids. Solving the Young-Laplace equation requires knowledge of appropriate capillary pressure values, which appear as a constant, and may not provide unique solution. To examine uniqueness of numerical solutions and volume minima determined from the Young-Laplace equation for unbounded-axisymmetric liquid bridges we analyzed capillary pressure for large and small liquid volume-asymptotic limits at zero Bond number.
Experiments were performed to compare with the volume minima calculations for Bond numbers 0.04⩽Bo⩽0.65. Three substrates of varying surface energy were used, with purified water as the primary liquid. Volume estimates and contact angle data were extracted via image analysis and evaporation rates measured from this data are reported.
Volume minima were in the range 0.1<V<20 μl depending on Bond number. There was good agreement when comparing predicted volume minima and those determined from experiments for the range of parameters studied.
在本文中,我们使用理论和实验研究了在平行平面相似或化学不同的基底之间受限制的蒸发无界轴对称液体桥的稳定性。我们假设准静态,通过 Young-Laplace 方程利用流体静力学来估算最小稳定体积 V,其 Bond 数为 0⩽Bo⩽1,顶/底壁接触角为 5°<θ<175°,尽管主要关注的是润湿和部分润湿液体。求解 Young-Laplace 方程需要了解适当的毛细压力值,这些值作为常数出现,并且可能无法提供唯一的解。为了检查无界轴对称液体桥的 Young-Laplace 方程的数值解和体积最小值的唯一性,我们分析了零 Bond 数下大体积和小体积渐近极限的毛细压力。
实验是为了与 Bond 数为 0.04⩽Bo⩽0.65 的体积最小值计算进行比较。使用了三种具有不同表面能的基底,以纯水作为主要液体。通过图像分析提取体积估算和接触角数据,并报告从这些数据中测量的蒸发速率。
体积最小值范围为 0.1<V<20 μl,具体取决于 Bond 数。在所研究的参数范围内,比较预测的体积最小值和实验确定的体积最小值时,结果吻合较好。