Suppr超能文献

使用 C 反应蛋白指导抗生素使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Use of C-reactive protein to tailor antibiotic use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022133.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

C-reactive protein (CRP) has been proposed to guide the use of antibiotics. However, study results are controversial regarding the benefits of such a strategy. We synthesised the evidence of CRP-based algorithms on antibiotic treatment initiation and on antibiotic treatment duration in adults, children and neonates, as well as their safety profile.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL from inception to 20 July 2017.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and cohort studies (prospective or retrospective) investigating CRP-guided antibiotic use in adults, children and neonates with bacterial infection.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two researchers independently screened all identified studies and retrieved the data. Outcomes were duration of antibiotic use, antibiotic initiation, mortality, infection relapse and hospitalisation. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool (RCTs), and A Cochrane Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (non-RCTs). We analysed our results using descriptive statistics and random effects models.

RESULTS

Of 11 165 studies screened, 15 were included. In five RCTs in adult outpatients, the risk difference for antibiotic treatment initiation in the CRP group was -7% (95% CI: -10% to -4%), with no difference in hospitalisation rate. In neonates, CRP-based algorithms shortened antibiotic treatment duration by -1.45 days (95% CI -2.61 to -0.28) in two RCTs, and by -1.15 days (95% CI -2.06 to -0.24) in two cohort studies, with no differences in mortality or infection relapse.

CONCLUSION

The use of CRP-based algorithms seems to reduce antibiotic treatment duration in neonates, as well as to decrease antibiotic treatment initiation in adult outpatients. However, further high-quality studies are still needed to assess safety, particularly in children outside the neonatal period.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016038622.

摘要

背景与目的

C 反应蛋白(CRP)已被提议用于指导抗生素的使用。然而,关于这种策略的益处,研究结果存在争议。我们综合了 CRP 为基础的算法在成人、儿童和新生儿中启动抗生素治疗和抗生素治疗持续时间的证据,以及它们的安全性概况。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

从建库到 2017 年 7 月 20 日,我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 CINAHL 数据库。

纳入研究的选择标准

我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验和队列研究(前瞻性或回顾性),这些研究调查了 CRP 指导的细菌性感染成人、儿童和新生儿的抗生素使用。

数据提取和综合

两位研究人员独立筛选了所有确定的研究并提取了数据。结局是抗生素使用的持续时间、抗生素的起始使用、死亡率、感染复发和住院治疗。我们使用 Cochrane 协作组的工具(RCT)和 Cochrane 干预措施风险偏倚评估工具:非随机研究和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(非 RCT)评估纳入研究的质量。我们使用描述性统计和随机效应模型分析结果。

结果

在筛选出的 11165 项研究中,有 15 项研究被纳入。在五项成人门诊患者的 RCT 中,CRP 组抗生素治疗起始的风险差异为 -7%(95%CI:-10%至-4%),住院率无差异。在新生儿中,两项 RCT 中 CRP 为基础的算法将抗生素治疗持续时间缩短了 -1.45 天(95%CI:-2.61 至 -0.28),两项队列研究中缩短了 -1.15 天(95%CI:-2.06 至 -0.24),死亡率或感染复发无差异。

结论

使用 CRP 为基础的算法似乎可以缩短新生儿的抗生素治疗持续时间,并减少成年门诊患者的抗生素治疗起始。然而,仍需要高质量的进一步研究来评估安全性,特别是在新生儿期以外的儿童中。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016038622。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0542/6318522/0c5c89776693/bmjopen-2018-022133f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验