Department of Pediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022133.
C-reactive protein (CRP) has been proposed to guide the use of antibiotics. However, study results are controversial regarding the benefits of such a strategy. We synthesised the evidence of CRP-based algorithms on antibiotic treatment initiation and on antibiotic treatment duration in adults, children and neonates, as well as their safety profile.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL from inception to 20 July 2017.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and cohort studies (prospective or retrospective) investigating CRP-guided antibiotic use in adults, children and neonates with bacterial infection.
Two researchers independently screened all identified studies and retrieved the data. Outcomes were duration of antibiotic use, antibiotic initiation, mortality, infection relapse and hospitalisation. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool (RCTs), and A Cochrane Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (non-RCTs). We analysed our results using descriptive statistics and random effects models.
Of 11 165 studies screened, 15 were included. In five RCTs in adult outpatients, the risk difference for antibiotic treatment initiation in the CRP group was -7% (95% CI: -10% to -4%), with no difference in hospitalisation rate. In neonates, CRP-based algorithms shortened antibiotic treatment duration by -1.45 days (95% CI -2.61 to -0.28) in two RCTs, and by -1.15 days (95% CI -2.06 to -0.24) in two cohort studies, with no differences in mortality or infection relapse.
The use of CRP-based algorithms seems to reduce antibiotic treatment duration in neonates, as well as to decrease antibiotic treatment initiation in adult outpatients. However, further high-quality studies are still needed to assess safety, particularly in children outside the neonatal period.
CRD42016038622.
C 反应蛋白(CRP)已被提议用于指导抗生素的使用。然而,关于这种策略的益处,研究结果存在争议。我们综合了 CRP 为基础的算法在成人、儿童和新生儿中启动抗生素治疗和抗生素治疗持续时间的证据,以及它们的安全性概况。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
从建库到 2017 年 7 月 20 日,我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 CINAHL 数据库。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验和队列研究(前瞻性或回顾性),这些研究调查了 CRP 指导的细菌性感染成人、儿童和新生儿的抗生素使用。
两位研究人员独立筛选了所有确定的研究并提取了数据。结局是抗生素使用的持续时间、抗生素的起始使用、死亡率、感染复发和住院治疗。我们使用 Cochrane 协作组的工具(RCT)和 Cochrane 干预措施风险偏倚评估工具:非随机研究和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(非 RCT)评估纳入研究的质量。我们使用描述性统计和随机效应模型分析结果。
在筛选出的 11165 项研究中,有 15 项研究被纳入。在五项成人门诊患者的 RCT 中,CRP 组抗生素治疗起始的风险差异为 -7%(95%CI:-10%至-4%),住院率无差异。在新生儿中,两项 RCT 中 CRP 为基础的算法将抗生素治疗持续时间缩短了 -1.45 天(95%CI:-2.61 至 -0.28),两项队列研究中缩短了 -1.15 天(95%CI:-2.06 至 -0.24),死亡率或感染复发无差异。
使用 CRP 为基础的算法似乎可以缩短新生儿的抗生素治疗持续时间,并减少成年门诊患者的抗生素治疗起始。然而,仍需要高质量的进一步研究来评估安全性,特别是在新生儿期以外的儿童中。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016038622。