Cohen Phillip, Friedrich Paola, Lam Catherine, Jeha Sima, Metzger Monika L, Qaddoumi Ibraham, Naidu Paula, Faughnan Lane, Rodriguez-Galindo Carlos, Bhakta Nickhill
Phillip Cohen, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Phillip Cohen, Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; and Paola Friedrich, Catherine Lam, Sima Jeha, Monika L. Metzger, Ibraham Qaddoumi, Paula Naidu, Lane Faughnan, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, and Nickhill Bhakta, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Dec;4:1-11. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.00150.
Global data mapping access to essential chemotherapeutics for pediatric cancer are scarce. We report a survey of international pediatric cancer care providers' access to these medicines.
A Web-based survey was sent to pediatric oncologists registered on the Cure4Kids Web portal. We queried chemotherapeutics in the WHO Essential Medicines List for Children, from which the average proportional availability was summarized as each country's access score. In addition, we examined availability of drug packages defined by the WHO-sanctioned Expert Committee for eight pediatric cancers. We undertook a sensitivity analysis investigating how regimen access would change if the cytotoxics specified in recent agreements between the Clinton Health Access Initiative, American Cancer Society, and pharmaceutical companies were universally available.
There were significant ( P < .001) differences in the median access scores between World Bank income groups, and 42.9% of respondents from low-income and lower middle-income countries reported suboptimal access scores. Our disease-based analysis revealed that 42.1% of patients in low-income and lower middle-income countries lacked full access to chemotherapy packages. Guaranteed availability of the cytotoxics specified in the Clinton Health Access Initiative/American Cancer Society agreements was projected to increase this regimen-based access by 1.6%, although including four additional chemotherapeutics would further increase coverage by 13.9%.
This study is the first, to our knowledge, to assess worldwide variation in practical access to pediatric chemotherapy. Although mapping the proportion of available chemotherapeutics is informative, we also developed a meaningful estimate of access using disease-specific drug packages. These data provide an important baseline for continued monitoring and can aid in planning adaptive treatment guidelines that consider the trade-offs between access and outcomes.
关于全球儿科癌症基本化疗药物获取情况的数据映射十分匮乏。我们报告了一项针对国际儿科癌症护理提供者获取这些药物情况的调查。
向在Cure4Kids网络门户注册的儿科肿瘤学家发送了一项基于网络的调查。我们查询了世界卫生组织儿童基本药物清单中的化疗药物,并将每个国家的平均比例可用性总结为获取分数。此外,我们还研究了世界卫生组织认可的专家委员会针对八种儿科癌症定义的药物包的可用性。我们进行了一项敏感性分析,以研究如果克林顿健康获取倡议组织、美国癌症协会与制药公司近期协议中规定的细胞毒性药物普遍可用,治疗方案的获取情况会如何变化。
世界银行收入组之间的中位数获取分数存在显著差异(P <.001),低收入和中低收入国家42.9%的受访者报告获取分数不理想。我们基于疾病的分析表明,低收入和中低收入国家42.1%的患者无法完全获取化疗药物包。预计克林顿健康获取倡议组织/美国癌症协会协议中规定的细胞毒性药物的有保障可用性将使基于治疗方案的获取率提高1.6%,不过再增加四种化疗药物将使覆盖率进一步提高13.9%。
据我们所知,本研究是首次评估全球儿科化疗实际获取情况的差异。虽然绘制可用化疗药物的比例很有意义,但我们也使用特定疾病的药物包对获取情况进行了有意义的估计。这些数据为持续监测提供了重要基线,并有助于制定考虑获取与治疗结果之间权衡的适应性治疗指南。