LBE, Univ Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Narbonne, France; Elsa, Research Group for Environmental Life cycle and Sustainability Assessment, Montpellier, France.
Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department of Industrial Ecology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25;658:768-776. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.194. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
Understanding the environmental profile of a product computed from the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework is sometimes challenging due to the high number of environmental indicators involved. The objective here, in guiding interpretation of LCA results, is to highlight the importance of each impact category for each product alternative studied. For a given product, the proposed methodology identifies the impact categories that are worth focusing on, relatively to a whole set of products from the same cumulated database. The approach extends the analysis of Representativeness Indices (RI) developed by Esnouf et al. (2018). It proposes a new operational tool for calculating RIs at the level of impact categories for a Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) result. Impact categories and LCI results are defined as vectors within a standardized vector space and a procedure is proposed to treat issues coming from the correlation of impact category vectors belonging to the same Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) method. From the cumulated ecoinvent database, LCI results of the Chinese and the German electricity mixes illustrate the method. Relevant impact categories of the EU-standardized ILCD method are then identified. RI results from all products of a cumulated LCI database were therefore analysed to assess the main tendencies of the impact categories of the ILCD method. This operational approach can then significantly contribute to the interpretation of the LCA results by pointing to the specificities of the inventories analysed and for identifying the main representative impact categories.
由于涉及到大量的环境指标,从生命周期评估(LCA)框架计算产品的环境概况有时具有挑战性。在这里,指导 LCA 结果的解释的目标是强调每个产品替代方案的每个影响类别对于研究的重要性。对于给定的产品,所提出的方法确定了相对于来自同一累积数据库的一组产品而言值得关注的影响类别。该方法扩展了 Esnouf 等人(2018 年)开发的代表性指数(RI)的分析。它提出了一种新的操作工具,用于在生命周期清单(LCI)结果的影响类别级别计算 RI。影响类别和 LCI 结果被定义为标准化向量空间内的向量,并且提出了一种处理属于同一生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法的影响类别向量相关性问题的程序。从累积的 ecoinvent 数据库中,中国和德国电力组合的 LCI 结果说明了该方法。然后确定了符合欧盟标准化 ILCD 方法的相关影响类别。因此,分析了累积 LCI 数据库中所有产品的 RI 结果,以评估 ILCD 方法的影响类别的主要趋势。这种操作方法可以通过指出所分析清单的特殊性和确定主要代表性影响类别,从而为 LCA 结果的解释做出重大贡献。