Mohamad Hanif Ezanee Azlina, Shah Shamsul Azhar
Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Email:
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Dec 25;19(12):3341-3351. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3341.
Breast cancer treatments leads to variable responses. Hormonal therapy is beneficial to receptor positive breast cancer subtypes and display better clinical outcome than triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) with FEC (5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide) the mainstay chemotherapy regiment. Owning to their negative expressions of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and HER2 receptors, disease recurrence and metastasis befalls some patients indicating resistance to FEC. Involvement of epigenetic silencing through DNA methylation, histone methylation, acetylation and sumoylation may be the key player in FEC chemoresistance. Epigenetic and molecular profiling successfully classified breast cancer subtypes, indicating potential driver mechanisms to the progression of TNBCs but functional mechanisms behind chemoresistance of these molecular markers are not well defined. Several epigenetic inhibitors and drugs have been used in the management of cancers but these attempts are mainly beneficial in hematopoietic cancers and not specifically favourable in solid tumours. Hypothetically, upon administration of epigenetic drugs, recovery of tumour suppressor genes is expected. However, high tendency of switching on global metastatic genes is predicted. Polycomb repressive complex (PRC) such as EZH2, SETD1A, DNMT, is known to have repressive effects in gene regulation and shown to inhibit cell proliferation and invasion in breast cancers. Individual epigenetic regulators may be an option to improve chemo-drug delivery in cancers. This review discussed on molecular signatures of various breast cancer subtypes and on-going attempts in understanding underlying molecular mechanisms of epigenetic regulators as well as providing insights on possible ways to utilize epigenetic enzymes/inhibitors with responses to chemotherapeutic drugs to re-program cellular and biological outcome in TNBCs.
乳腺癌治疗会导致不同的反应。激素疗法对受体阳性乳腺癌亚型有益,并且与以FEC(5-氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星和环磷酰胺)为主的化疗方案相比,其临床结果更好。由于雌激素(ER)、孕激素(PR)和HER2受体的阴性表达,一些患者会出现疾病复发和转移,表明对FEC耐药。通过DNA甲基化、组蛋白甲基化、乙酰化和SUMO化进行的表观遗传沉默可能是FEC化疗耐药的关键因素。表观遗传和分子谱分析成功地对乳腺癌亚型进行了分类,表明三阴乳腺癌(TNBC)进展的潜在驱动机制,但这些分子标志物化疗耐药背后的功能机制尚不清楚。几种表观遗传抑制剂和药物已用于癌症治疗,但这些尝试主要对血液系统癌症有益,对实体瘤并不特别有利。假设给予表观遗传药物,有望恢复肿瘤抑制基因。然而,预计会有开启全局转移基因的高倾向。已知多梳抑制复合物(PRC)如EZH2、SETD1A、DNMT在基因调控中具有抑制作用,并在乳腺癌中显示出抑制细胞增殖和侵袭的作用。单个表观遗传调节因子可能是改善癌症化疗药物递送的一种选择。本综述讨论了各种乳腺癌亚型的分子特征,以及在理解表观遗传调节因子潜在分子机制方面正在进行的尝试,并提供了关于利用表观遗传酶/抑制剂以及对化疗药物的反应来重新编程TNBC细胞和生物学结果的可能方法的见解。