Agarwal Girija, Hamady Mohamad
Department of Interventional Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
BJR Open. 2024 Aug 22;6(1):tzae024. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzae024. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an established approach to treating abdominal aortic aneurysms, however, challenges arise when the aneurysm involves visceral branches with insufficient normal segment of the aorta to provide aneurysm seal without excluding those vessels. To overcome this, a range of technological developments and solutions have been proposed including fenestrated, branched, physician-modified stents, and chimney techniques. Understanding the currently available evidence for each option is essential to select the most suitable procedure for each patient. Overall, the evidence for fenestrated endovascular repair is the most comprehensive of these techniques and shows an early post-operative advantage over open surgical repair (OSR) but with a catch-up mortality in the mid-term period. In this review, we will describe these endovascular options, pre- and post-procedure radiological assessment and current evidence of outcomes.
血管内主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)是治疗腹主动脉瘤的一种既定方法,然而,当动脉瘤累及内脏分支且主动脉正常节段不足,无法在不排除这些血管的情况下实现动脉瘤封闭时,就会出现挑战。为克服这一问题,人们提出了一系列技术发展和解决方案,包括开窗、分支、医生改良支架以及烟囱技术。了解每种选择的现有证据对于为每位患者选择最合适的手术至关重要。总体而言,开窗血管内修复术的证据是这些技术中最全面的,显示出术后早期优于开放手术修复(OSR),但中期死亡率会逐渐赶上。在本综述中,我们将描述这些血管内选择、术前和术后的放射学评估以及当前的疗效证据。