Abbasi Saeed, Shaker Hossein, Zareiee Fariba, Farsi Davood, Hafezimoghadam Peyman, Rezai Mahdi, Mahshidfar Babak, Mofidi Mani
Emergency medicine management research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1):e55. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
Chest ultrasonography is routinely used in evaluation of chest trauma for diagnosis of pulmonary injury. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of B-Lines for diagnosing lung contusion in patients with blunt trauma of the chest.
Trauma patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study and underwent ultrasonography by trained emergency medicine residents. Ultrasound results were recorded in terms of number of B-lines and the existence of peripheral parenchymal lesion (PPL). After ultrasound, the patient underwent chest x-ray and chest CT scan (as reference test) and screening performance of B-lines and PPL were evaluated.
147 patients underwent chest ultrasound. The mean age of the patients was 40.74 ± 18.6 (78.9% male). B-lines˃3 had 94.0% (95% CI: 83.45-98.75) sensitivity and 57.7% (95% CI: 47.3-67.7) specificity, B-lines˃6 had 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2-96.7) sensitivity and 93.81% (95% CI: 87.0-97.7) specificity, and PPL had 34.0% (95% CI: 21.2-48.8) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 96.3-100.0) specificity. Composite findings of B-lines˃6 + PPL had 92.0% (95% CI: 80.8-97. 8) sensitivity and 93.8% (95% CI: 87.0-97.7) specificity in the diagnosis of lung contusion.
PPL and B-Lines˃6 had the highest accuracy in detecting lung contusion. B-Line˃6 had high sensitivity and specificity and was easy to perform; thus, it seems that B-Line˃6 could be considered as an alternative screening tool in detection of lung contusion.
胸部超声检查常用于评估胸部创伤以诊断肺损伤。本研究旨在评估B线在诊断钝性胸部创伤患者肺挫伤中的准确性。
符合纳入标准的创伤患者纳入本研究,并由训练有素的急诊医学住院医师进行超声检查。超声结果根据B线数量和外周实质病变(PPL)的存在情况进行记录。超声检查后,患者接受胸部X线和胸部CT扫描(作为参考检查),并评估B线和PPL的筛查性能。
147例患者接受了胸部超声检查。患者的平均年龄为40.74±18.6岁(男性占78.9%)。B线>3条时,敏感性为94.0%(95%CI:83.45 - 98.75),特异性为57.7%(95%CI:47.3 - 67.7);B线>6条时,敏感性为90.0%(95%CI:78.2 - 96.7),特异性为93.81%(95%CI:87.0 - 97.7);PPL的敏感性为34.0%(95%CI:21.2 - 48.8),特异性为100%(95%CI:96.3 - 100.0)。B线>6条 + PPL的综合结果在诊断肺挫伤时,敏感性为92.0%(95%CI:80.8 - 97.8),特异性为93.8%(9�CI:87.0 - 97.7)。
PPL和B线>6条在检测肺挫伤方面具有最高的准确性。B线>6条具有高敏感性和特异性且易于操作;因此,似乎B线>6条可被视为检测肺挫伤的一种替代筛查工具。