Thiele Holger, Zeymer Uwe, Thelemann Nathalie, Neumann Franz-Josef, Hausleiter Jörg, Abdel-Wahab Mohamed, Meyer-Saraei Roza, Fuernau Georg, Eitel Ingo, Hambrecht Rainer, Böhm Michael, Werdan Karl, Felix Stephan B, Hennersdorf Marcus, Schneider Steffen, Ouarrak Taoufik, Desch Steffen, de Waha-Thiele Suzanne
Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Germany (H.T., M.A.-W., S.D.).
Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (H.T., M.A.-W., S.D.).
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):395-403. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
The role of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in cardiogenic shock is still a subject of intense debate despite the neutral results of the IABP-SHOCK II trial (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II) with subsequent downgrading in international guidelines. So far, randomized data on the impact of IABP on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. Furthermore, only limited evidence is available on general long-term outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock treated by contemporary practice.
The IABP-SHOCK II trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Between 2009 and 2012, 600 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction undergoing early revascularization were randomized to IABP versus control.
Long-term follow-up was performed 6.2 years (interquartile range 5.6-6.7) after initial randomization. Follow-up was completed for 591 of 600 patients (98.5%). Mortality was not different between the IABP and the control group (66.3% versus 67.0%; relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11; =0.98). There were also no differences in recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, or rehospitalization for cardiac reasons (all >0.05). Survivors' quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol 5D questionnaire and the New York Heart Association class did not differ between groups.
IABP has no effect on all-cause mortality at 6-year long-term follow-up. Mortality is still very high, with two thirds of patients with cardiogenic shock dying despite contemporary treatment with revascularization therapy.
URL: https://www.
gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00491036.
尽管主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)-休克II试验(心源性休克II中的主动脉内球囊泵)结果呈中性,且随后国际指南对其推荐等级下调,但IABP在治疗心源性休克中的作用仍是激烈争论的话题。目前,缺乏关于IABP对合并急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者长期临床结局影响的随机数据。此外,关于当代治疗下心源性休克患者总体长期结局的证据也很有限。
IABP-休克II试验是一项多中心、随机、开放标签试验。2009年至2012年期间,600例合并急性心肌梗死且接受早期血运重建的心源性休克患者被随机分为IABP组和对照组。
在首次随机分组后6.2年(四分位间距5.6 - 6.7年)进行长期随访。600例患者中有591例(98.5%)完成随访。IABP组和对照组的死亡率无差异(66.3%对67.0%;相对风险0.99;95%可信区间0.88 - 1.11;P = 0.98)。复发性心肌梗死、中风、再次血运重建或因心脏原因再次住院的情况也无差异(均P>0.05)。通过欧洲五维健康量表问卷和纽约心脏协会心功能分级评估的幸存者生活质量在两组间无差异。
在6年长期随访中,IABP对全因死亡率无影响。尽管采用当代血运重建治疗,但心源性休克患者的死亡率仍然很高,三分之二的患者死亡。
网址:https://www.
gov/。唯一标识符:NCT00491036。