• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期宫颈癌患者的临终关怀利用情况:国家住院患者样本分析。

Hospice utilization in advanced cervical malignancies: An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, United States of America.

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, United States of America.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;152(3):594-598. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.016
PMID:30587442
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hospice services improve quality of life and outcomes for patients and caretakers, compared to inpatient mortality. This study identifies factors that exert the strongest influence on end-of-life care modalities in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

Admissions with a diagnosis of cervical cancer that were discharged to hospice or died in-hospital were identified in the National Inpatient Sample years 2007-2011, excluding admissions coded for hysterectomy. Logistic regression models were used to examine differences in age, race, length of stay, primary payer, hospital region, admission type, hospital bedsize, hospital teaching status, income quartile, and Elixhauser comorbidity index score between the groups.

RESULTS

2073 admissions with a diagnosis of cervical cancer resulting in hospice discharge (n = 1290) or inpatient death (n = 783) were identified. Age (P = 0.01), hospital region (P = 0.01), length of hospitalization (P < 0.01), Elixhauser comorbidity index score (P = 0.03), and urban vs. rural location (P = 0.01) had a significant impact on disposition in univariate analysis. Admissions of patients categorized as Asian/Pacific Islander (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.11-4.49), hospitalizations lasting 0-3 days (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.03), and admissions in rural areas (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.12-2.36) had higher rates of in-hospital death compared to the reference groups. Patients aged 18-45 years (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.90) and those treated in the South (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77) and West (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.81) had lower odds ratios of inpatient mortality.

CONCLUSION

Modalities of care in terminal cervical cancer vary among sociodemographic and clinical factors. This data underscores the continued push for improved end-of-life care among cervical cancer patients and can guide clinicians in appropriate targeted counseling to increase utilization of hospice resources.

摘要

目的

与住院死亡率相比,临终关怀服务可提高患者和护理人员的生活质量和预后。本研究旨在确定对宫颈癌患者临终关怀模式影响最大的因素。

方法

从 2007 年至 2011 年的国家住院患者样本中确定了诊断为宫颈癌且出院至临终关怀或住院死亡的患者,排除了因子宫切除术而入院的患者。采用 logistic 回归模型比较两组间年龄、种族、住院时间、主要支付者、医院所在地区、入院类型、医院床位数、医院教学地位、收入四分位间距和 Elixhauser 合并症指数评分的差异。

结果

共确定了 2073 例因宫颈癌而被诊断为出院至临终关怀(n=1290)或住院死亡(n=783)的患者。年龄(P=0.01)、医院所在地区(P=0.01)、住院时间(P<0.01)、Elixhauser 合并症指数评分(P=0.03)和城市与农村地区的位置(P=0.01)对单因素分析中的处置有显著影响。归类为亚洲/太平洋岛民(OR=2.24,95%CI 1.11-4.49)、住院时间 0-3 天(OR=1.57,95%CI 1.21-2.03)和农村地区入院(OR=1.62,95%CI 1.12-2.36)的患者住院死亡率更高。年龄在 18-45 岁之间(OR=0.69,95%CI 0.52-0.90)和在南部(OR 0.59,95%CI 0.45-0.77)和西部(OR=0.50,95%CI 0.30-0.81)接受治疗的患者住院死亡率较低。

结论

宫颈癌终末期的治疗模式因社会人口统计学和临床因素而异。这些数据强调了继续为宫颈癌患者提供更好的临终关怀服务的必要性,并可以指导临床医生进行适当的针对性咨询,以增加对临终关怀资源的利用。

相似文献

1
Hospice utilization in advanced cervical malignancies: An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.晚期宫颈癌患者的临终关怀利用情况:国家住院患者样本分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;152(3):594-598. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
2
Discharge dispositions, complications, and costs of hospitalization in spinal cord tumor surgery: analysis of data from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2003-2010.脊髓肿瘤手术住院患者的出院转归、并发症和住院费用:对 2003-2010 年美国全国住院患者样本数据的分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Feb;20(2):125-41. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE13274. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
3
Outpatient end of life discussions shorten hospital admissions in gynecologic oncology patients.门诊终末期讨论可缩短妇科肿瘤患者的住院时间。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
4
Disparities in Hospice Utilization for Older Cancer Patients Living in the Deep South.美国南部深南部地区老年癌症患者临终关怀利用的差异。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jul;58(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Place of death for patients with cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2015: Racial, age, and geographic disparities.美国癌症患者的死亡地点,1999 年至 2015 年:种族、年龄和地域差异。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4408-4419. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31737. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
6
Race as a Predictor of Palliative Care Referral Time, Hospice Utilization, and Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Noncomparative Analysis.种族作为姑息治疗转诊时间、临终关怀利用情况和住院时间的预测因素:一项回顾性非对比分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):110-116. doi: 10.1177/1049909116686733. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Trends in hospice discharge, documented inpatient palliative care services and inpatient mortality in ovarian carcinoma.卵巢癌患者临终关怀出院情况、住院姑息治疗服务记录及住院死亡率的趋势
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.238. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
The impact of comorbidities, regional trends, and hospital factors on discharge dispositions and hospital costs after acoustic neuroma microsurgery: a United States nationwide inpatient data sample study (2005-2009).伴发疾病、地区趋势和医院因素对听神经瘤显微手术后出院处置和住院费用的影响:一项美国全国住院患者数据样本研究(2005-2009 年)。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Sep;33(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12193.
9
The influence of hospice use on nursing home and hospital use in assisted living among dual-eligible enrollees.在有双重资格的参保者中,临终关怀的使用对辅助生活护理院和医院使用的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):189.e9-189.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK.区域差异对住院临终关怀和死亡地点的地理可达性:英国基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231666. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
2
Hospice Referral in Advanced Cancer in New Jersey.新泽西州晚期癌症患者的临终关怀转诊。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Jun 1;24(3):167-174. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000845. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
3
Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.
城乡癌症结局差异:未来研究的机遇。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):940-952. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac030.
4
Health Care Access Measures and Palliative Care Use by Race/Ethnicity among Metastatic Gynecological Cancer Patients in the United States.美国转移性妇科癌症患者的种族/民族健康保健获取措施和姑息治疗使用情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116040.