Worster Brooke, Bell Declan Kennedy, Roy Vibin, Cunningham Amy, LaNoue Marianna, Parks Susan
1 Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):110-116. doi: 10.1177/1049909116686733. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Palliative care is associated with significant benefits, including reduced pain and suffering, an increased likelihood of patients dying in their preferred location, and decreased health-care expenditures. Racial and ethnic disparities are well-documented in hospice use and referral patterns; however, it is unclear whether these disparities apply to inpatient palliative care services.
To determine if race is a significant predictor of time to inpatient palliative care consult, patient enrollment in hospice, and patients' overall hospital length of stay among patients of an inpatient palliative care service.
Retrospective noncomparative analysis.
Urban academic medical center in the United States.
3207 patients referred to an inpatient palliative care service between March 2006 and April 2015.
Time to palliative care consult, disposition of hospice/not hospice (excluding patients who died), and hospital length of stay among patients by racial (Asian, black, Native American/Eskimo, Hispanic, white, Unknown) and ethnic (Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic, Unknown) background.
Race was not a significant predictor of time to inpatient palliative care consult, discharge to hospice, or hospital length of stay. Similarly, black/white, Hispanic/white, and Asian/white variables were not significant predictors of hospice enrollment ( Ps > .05).
Study was conducted at 1 urban academic medical center, limiting generalizability; hospital race and ethnicity categorizations may also limit interpretation of results.
In this urban hospital, race was not a predictor of time to inpatient palliative care service consult, discharge to hospice, or hospital length of stay. Confirmatory studies of inpatient palliative care services in other institutions are needed.
姑息治疗具有显著益处,包括减轻疼痛和痛苦、增加患者在其首选地点离世的可能性以及降低医疗保健支出。临终关怀的使用和转诊模式中存在明显的种族和民族差异;然而,这些差异是否适用于住院姑息治疗服务尚不清楚。
确定种族是否是住院姑息治疗服务患者中进行住院姑息治疗会诊时间、患者进入临终关怀机构以及患者总体住院时间的重要预测因素。
回顾性非对照分析。
美国的一家城市学术医疗中心。
2006年3月至2015年4月期间转诊至住院姑息治疗服务的3207名患者。
按种族(亚洲人、黑人、美洲原住民/爱斯基摩人、西班牙裔、白人、未知)和民族(西班牙裔/拉丁裔、非西班牙裔、未知)背景划分的患者进行姑息治疗会诊的时间、进入/未进入临终关怀机构的情况(不包括死亡患者)以及住院时间。
种族不是住院姑息治疗会诊时间、出院进入临终关怀机构或住院时间的重要预测因素。同样,黑人/白人、西班牙裔/白人以及亚洲人/白人变量也不是进入临终关怀机构的重要预测因素(P > 0.05)。
研究在一家城市学术医疗中心进行,限制了结果的普遍性;医院对种族和民族的分类也可能限制对结果的解释。
在这家城市医院中,种族不是住院姑息治疗服务会诊时间、出院进入临终关怀机构或住院时间的预测因素。需要在其他机构对住院姑息治疗服务进行验证性研究。