Nemoto Yuta, Kuraoka Masataka, Nonaka Kumiko, Tanaka Motoki, Murayama Sachiko, Matsunaga Hiroko, Yasunaga Masashi, Kobayashi Erika, Murayama Hiroshi, Watanabe Shuichiro, Inaba Yoji, Fujiwara Yoshinori
Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology.
Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(12):719-729. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.12_719.
Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between intra- and inter-generational exchange and mental health among young adults aged 25-49 years and older adults aged 65-84 years.Methods In 2016, a community-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted. A total of 3,334 young adults (valid response rate: 24.6%), and 3,116 older adults (valid response rate: 46.0%) completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Their mental health was evaluated using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and those who scored under 13 or scored less than one on any item were considered to have poor mental health. To evaluate the intra- or inter-generational exchange, participants were asked about their frequency of interaction with people aged 20-49 years or aged ≥70, excluding family and co-workers. Young adults who interacted with people aged 20-49 years or older adults who interacted with people ≥70 were classified as "having intra-generational exchange," while young adults who interacted with people ≥70 years or older adults who interacted with people aged 20-49 years were classified as "having intergenerational exchange." Therefore, individuals who interacted with both generations were classified as "having multi-generational exchange," and those who did not interact with any generation were categorized as "no exchange." We conducted a logistic regression analysis that included mental health as a dependent variable, intra- and inter-generational exchange as independent variables, and gender, age, educational attainment, marital status, living situation, subjective economic status, social participation, employment, self-rated health, and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living as covariates.Results Of the 3,334 young adults, 61.5% were mentally healthy, 51.3% had intra-generational exchange, 21.9% had inter-generational exchange, 16.5% had multi-generational exchange, and 42.7% did not have any exchange. Of the 3,116 older adults, 65.8% were mentally healthy, 67.9% had intra-generational exchange, 34.3% had inter-generational exchange, 29.9% had multi-generational exchange, and 21.1% did not have any exchange. A logistic regression analysis revealed that "having intra-generational exchange" and "having intergenerational exchange" were significantly related to better mental health in both young adults (intra-generational; Odds ratios (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.10-1.30: inter-generational; OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25) and older adults (intra-generational; OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29: inter-generational; OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30-1.65). Therefore, "having multi-generational exchange" was more strongly related to better mental health compared with "only having intra-generational exchange."Conclusion Among young and older adults, intra- and inter-generational exchange were related to better mental health, and multi-generational exchange showed the strongest relationship with better mental health.
目的 本研究旨在探讨25 - 49岁的年轻人与65 - 84岁的老年人代内和代际交流与心理健康之间的关系。方法 2016年进行了一项基于社区的横断面调查。共有3334名年轻人(有效回复率:24.6%)和3116名老年人(有效回复率:46.0%)完成了调查并纳入分析。使用世界卫生组织五福指数(WHO - 5)评估他们的心理健康状况,得分低于13分或任何一项得分低于1分的人被认为心理健康状况不佳。为了评估代内或代际交流情况,参与者被问及与20 - 49岁或70岁及以上人群(不包括家人和同事)的互动频率。与20 - 49岁人群互动的年轻人或与70岁及以上人群互动的老年人被归类为“有代内交流”,与70岁及以上人群互动的年轻人或与20 - 49岁人群互动的老年人被归类为“有代际交流”。因此,与两代人都有互动的个体被归类为“有多代交流”,而与任何一代人都没有互动的人被归类为“无交流”。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,将心理健康作为因变量,代内和代际交流作为自变量,将性别、年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况、生活状况、主观经济状况、社会参与、就业、自评健康和日常生活工具性活动作为协变量。结果 在3334名年轻人中,61.5%心理健康,51.3%有代内交流,21.9%有代际交流,16.5%有多代交流,42.7%无交流。在3116名老年人中,65.8%心理健康,67.9%有代内交流,34.3%有代际交流,29.9%有多代交流,21.1%无交流。逻辑回归分析显示,“有代内交流”和“有代际交流”与年轻人(代内交流;比值比(OR)1.19,95%置信区间(CI)1.10 - 1.30;代际交流;OR 1.13,95% CI 1.03 - 1.25)和老年人(代内交流;OR 1.15,95% CI 1.02 - 1.29;代际交流;OR 1.46,95% CI 1.30 - 1.65)的心理健康状况更好显著相关。因此,与“仅有代内交流”相比,“有多代交流”与更好的心理健康状况的关系更强。结论 在年轻人和老年人中,代内和代际交流与更好的心理健康状况相关,而多代交流与更好的心理健康状况的关系最为密切。