• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将病情恶化的心力衰竭治疗从住院管理环境转移至门诊管理环境对医疗保险产生的成本影响。

The cost impact to Medicare of shifting treatment of worsening heart failure from inpatient to outpatient management settings.

作者信息

Fitch Kathryn, Lau Jocelyn, Engel Tyler, Medicis Joseph J, Mohr John F, Weintraub William S

机构信息

Milliman Inc., New York, NY, USA,

scPharmaceuticals Inc., Burlington, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec 14;10:855-863. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S184048. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S184048
PMID:30588047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6298883/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify the potential cost savings to Medicare of shifting the site of treatment for worsening heart failure (HF) from inpatient to outpatient (OP) settings for a subset of worsening HF episodes among the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of a random 5% sample of 2014 FFS Medicare beneficiaries was conducted. Incidence and cost of worsening HF episodes in both inpatient and OP settings were identified. These results were used to calculate cost savings associated with shifting a proportion of worsening HF episodes from the inpatient to OP settings.

RESULTS

A total of 151,908 HF beneficiaries were identified. The estimated annual cost for the treatment of worsening HF across both inpatient and OP settings ranged from US$9.3 billion to US$17.0 billion or 2.4%-4.3% of total Medicare FFS spend. The cost saving associated with shifting worsening HF treatment from inpatient hospital setting to OP settings was US$667.5 million or 0.17% of total Medicare spend when 10% of HF admissions were targeted and 60% of targeted HF admissions were successfully shifted. The cost savings increased to US$2.098 billion or 0.53% of total Medicare spend when 20% of HF admissions were targeted and 90% of targeted HF admissions were successfully shifted.

CONCLUSION

Treatment options that can shift costly hospital admissions for worsening HF treatment to less expensive OP settings potentially lead to significant cost savings to Medicare. Pursuit of OP therapy options for treating worsening HF might be considered a viable alternative.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是量化对于医疗保险计划(Medicare)按服务付费(FFS)人群中一部分病情恶化的心力衰竭(HF)患者,将治疗地点从住院转为门诊(OP)所可能节省的费用。

材料与方法

对2014年FFS Medicare受益人的5%随机样本进行横断面分析。确定住院和门诊环境中病情恶化的HF发作的发生率和费用。这些结果用于计算将一部分病情恶化的HF发作从住院环境转移到门诊环境所节省的费用。

结果

共识别出151,908名HF受益人。住院和门诊环境中治疗病情恶化的HF的估计年度费用在93亿美元至170亿美元之间,占Medicare FFS总支出的2.4% - 4.3%。当针对10%的HF入院病例且60%的目标HF入院病例成功转移时,将病情恶化的HF治疗从住院医院环境转移到门诊环境所节省的费用为6.675亿美元,占Medicare总支出的0.17%。当针对20%的HF入院病例且90%的目标HF入院病例成功转移时,节省的费用增加到20.98亿美元,占Medicare总支出的0.53%。

结论

能够将用于治疗病情恶化的HF的昂贵住院治疗转移到费用较低的门诊环境的治疗选择,有可能为Medicare节省大量费用。寻求用于治疗病情恶化的HF的门诊治疗选择可能被认为是一种可行的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/1ed01ac2fb1e/ceor-10-855Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/c599e87812e0/ceor-10-855Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/38e5154d74dd/ceor-10-855Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/1ed01ac2fb1e/ceor-10-855Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/c599e87812e0/ceor-10-855Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/38e5154d74dd/ceor-10-855Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ced0/6298883/1ed01ac2fb1e/ceor-10-855Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The cost impact to Medicare of shifting treatment of worsening heart failure from inpatient to outpatient management settings.将病情恶化的心力衰竭治疗从住院管理环境转移至门诊管理环境对医疗保险产生的成本影响。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec 14;10:855-863. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S184048. eCollection 2018.
2
Inpatient Utilization and Costs for Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with Heart Failure.医疗保险按服务收费受益人心力衰竭患者的住院使用情况及费用
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Apr;9(2):96-104.
3
Cost savings for pVAD compared to ECMO in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An episode-of-care analysis.pVAD 在心梗合并心源性休克治疗中相较于 ECMO 的成本节约:基于单病种的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):703-710. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29181. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
Contemporary Epidemiology of Heart Failure in Fee-For-Service Medicare Beneficiaries Across Healthcare Settings.按服务收费的医疗保险受益人群体在不同医疗环境下心力衰竭的当代流行病学
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004402.
5
IV Diuresis in Alternative Treatment Settings for the Management of Heart Failure: Implications for Mortality, Hospitalizations and Cost.在心力衰竭管理的替代治疗环境中进行 IV 利尿:对死亡率、住院和成本的影响。
J Card Fail. 2024 Jan;30(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
How Much Does Medication Nonadherence Cost the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program?药物不依从性给医疗保险按服务项目付费计划造成多大损失?
Med Care. 2019 Mar;57(3):218-224. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001067.
7
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的败血症:1. 2012-2018 年败血症负担。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):276-288. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004224.
8
Trends in Medicare Payment Rates for Noninvasive Cardiac Tests and Association With Testing Location.无创心脏检查的医疗保险支付率趋势及其与检查地点的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1699-1706. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4269.
9
Socioeconomic status and access to care and the incidence of a heart failure diagnosis in the inpatient and outpatient settings.社会经济地位与医疗可及性和心力衰竭诊断的发生率:住院和门诊环境。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
Economic Burden of Inpatient Admission of Ankle Fractures.踝关节骨折住院治疗的经济负担
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Sep;38(9):997-1004. doi: 10.1177/1071100717709576. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Heart Failure Management System in the United States.美国心力衰竭管理系统的成本效益分析
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Mar 17;12(1):113-119. doi: 10.36469/001c.130066. eCollection 2025.
2
IV Diuresis in Alternative Treatment Settings for the Management of Heart Failure: Implications for Mortality, Hospitalizations and Cost.在心力衰竭管理的替代治疗环境中进行 IV 利尿:对死亡率、住院和成本的影响。
J Card Fail. 2024 Jan;30(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Ambulatory Management of Worsening Heart Failure: Current Strategies and Future Directions.

本文引用的文献

1
Subcutaneous Furosemide in Heart Failure: Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of a Newly Buffered Solution.皮下注射速尿治疗心力衰竭:一种新的缓冲溶液的药代动力学特征
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018 Feb 7;3(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.10.001. eCollection 2018 Feb.
2
Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions Under Observation Versus Short Inpatient Stay.心力衰竭患者接受观察治疗与短期住院治疗的结局比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 31;7(3):e007944. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007944.
3
Outpatient Worsening Heart Failure as a Target for Therapy: A Review.
心力衰竭病情恶化的门诊管理:当前策略与未来方向
Heart Int. 2021 Jun 7;15(1):49-53. doi: 10.17925/HI.2021.15.1.49. eCollection 2021.
4
Incidence of Timely Outpatient Follow-Up Care After Emergency Department Encounters for Acute Heart Failure.急性心力衰竭急诊后及时门诊随访的发生率。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Sep;15(9):e009001. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009001. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
Burden of hospitalization for heart failure in the United States: a systematic literature review.美国心力衰竭住院负担:系统文献回顾。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Feb;28(2):157-167. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.2.157.
6
A Systematic Review of Medical Costs Associated with Heart Failure in the USA (2014-2020).美国与心力衰竭相关的医疗费用的系统评价(2014-2020 年)。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Nov;38(11):1219-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00952-0.
7
Outpatient treatment of worsening heart failure with intravenous and subcutaneous diuretics: a systematic review of the literature.静脉和皮下注射利尿剂用于门诊治疗失代偿性心力衰竭:文献系统综述
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):892-902. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12677. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Have Traditional Heart Failure Management Programs Reached Their "Use by" Date? Time to Apply More Nuanced Care.传统的心力衰竭管理方案是否已过“保质期”?是时候采用更细致入微的护理方式了。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019 Jun;16(3):75-80. doi: 10.1007/s11897-019-00426-1.
门诊心力衰竭恶化作为治疗靶点:综述。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):252-259. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.5250.
4
Efficacy of Intravenous Furosemide Versus a Novel, pH-Neutral Furosemide Formulation Administered Subcutaneously in Outpatients With Worsening Heart Failure.静脉注射呋塞米与新型 pH 中性呋塞米皮下制剂在门诊心力衰竭恶化患者中的疗效比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;6(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
Remote monitoring of heart failure: benefits for therapeutic decision making.心力衰竭的远程监测:对治疗决策的益处
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jul;15(7):503-515. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1348229. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Economic burden of hospitalizations of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure.医疗保险受益人心力衰竭住院的经济负担。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2017 May 10;10:63-70. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S130341. eCollection 2017.
7
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
8
Inpatient Utilization and Costs for Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with Heart Failure.医疗保险按服务收费受益人心力衰竭患者的住院使用情况及费用
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Apr;9(2):96-104.
9
Temporal Trends in Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in the United States, 1998-2011.1998 - 2011年美国急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院治疗的时间趋势
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 1;183(5):462-70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv455. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Intravenous Diuretic Therapy for the Management of Heart Failure and Volume Overload in a Multidisciplinary Outpatient Unit.静脉利尿剂治疗在多学科门诊单位的心力衰竭和容量超负荷管理。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Jan;4(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Dec 2.