Beveridge R A, Chan D W, Bruzek D, Damron D, Bray K R, Gaur P K, Ettinger D S, Rock R C, Shurbaji M S, Kuhajda F P
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD 21205.
J Clin Oncol. 1988 Dec;6(12):1815-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.12.1815.
Serum biomarkers are not very reliable in assessing outcome or predicting recurrence of breast cancer. Clinically, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is widely used and is elevated in a majority of patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, it is falsely elevated in a wide range of nonmalignant conditions and correlates poorly with disease progression. We evaluated a newly described monoclonal antibody, CA 549, in an immunoradiometric assay which uses two monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor and milk fat globule membranes. CA 549 and CEA were studied in 682 patients, 331 of whom had breast diseases and 99 of whom were followed with multiple serum samples. Of 69 patients with benign breast diseases, 1.5% had elevated CA 549, 0% of 30 pregnant women had elevated CA 549, and 26% of patients with nonmalignant liver disease had CA 549 elevation. In metastatic cancer of prostate, ovary, endometrium, colon, and lung CA 549 was elevated in 12% to 50% of cases with levels less than 120 U/mL. In breast cancer, CA 549 was elevated in 11% of 88 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and had no evidence of metastasis; in 23% of 16 patients in complete remission after chemotherapy; in 63% of 52 patients in partial remission after therapy; and in 83% of 106 patients with progression of breast cancer compared with 63% with elevated CEA (P = .001). In diseases of the breast, CA 549 has a sensitivity In diseases of the breast, CA 549 has a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 92% v 61% and 92% for CEA. Of 99 patients serially monitored with clinically documented breast cancer progression, regression, or stability of disease, CA 549 was statistically significantly superior to CEA in monitoring a greater than 25% change in those patients with metastatic progression (P = .03). CA 549 is a new serum marker that should be control tested in prospective clinical trials alone or in conjunction with other markers.
血清生物标志物在评估乳腺癌预后或预测复发方面不太可靠。临床上,癌胚抗原(CEA)被广泛应用,大多数转移性乳腺癌患者的CEA水平会升高。然而,在多种非恶性疾病中CEA会出现假升高,且与疾病进展的相关性较差。我们在一种免疫放射分析中评估了一种新描述的单克隆抗体CA 549,该分析使用两种针对肿瘤和乳脂肪球膜的单克隆抗体。对682例患者进行了CA 549和CEA研究,其中331例患有乳腺疾病,99例接受了多次血清样本随访。69例良性乳腺疾病患者中,1.5%的患者CA 549升高,30例孕妇中0%的患者CA 549升高,非恶性肝病患者中有26%的患者CA 549升高。在前列腺、卵巢、子宫内膜、结肠和肺癌的转移性癌症中,12%至50%的病例CA 549升高,水平低于120 U/mL。在乳腺癌中,88例接受辅助化疗且无转移证据的患者中11%的患者CA 549升高;化疗后完全缓解的16例患者中有23%的患者CA 549升高;治疗后部分缓解的52例患者中有63%的患者CA 549升高;乳腺癌进展的106例患者中有83%的患者CA 549升高,而CEA升高的患者为63%(P = 0.001)。在乳腺疾病中,CA 549的敏感性和特异性分别为77%和92%,而CEA为61%和92%。在99例经临床记录有乳腺癌进展、消退或病情稳定的患者中,在监测那些有转移性进展的患者中大于25%的变化时,CA 549在统计学上显著优于CEA(P = 0.03)。CA 549是一种新的血清标志物,应单独或与其他标志物一起在前瞻性临床试验中进行对照测试。