Colomer R, Ruibal A, Salvador L
Division of Medical Oncology, Valle de Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Cancer. 1989 Oct 15;64(8):1674-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891015)64:8<1674::aid-cncr2820640820>3.0.co;2-v.
The importance of the extent of metastatic disease in the circulating levels of CA 15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA) was studied in 173 patients with advanced breast carcinoma. Estimates of the extent of metastatic disease were obtained by an objective arbitrary scale. Patients were observed clinically after serum samples were obtained, and survival was recorded. Elevated values of CA 15-3 (greater than 40 U/ml) were seen in 130 patients and CEA values (greater than 5 ng/ml) in 97 cases (75% versus 56%, P less than .0001). Elevated CA 15-3 values correlated with the estimated extent of metastatic disease (P less than .0001), number of metastases (P = .0006), and survival from study entry (P = .01). Elevated CEA values correlated with extent of disease (P less than .0001), but not with the number of metastases or with survival. No correlation was found between the elevated values of CA 15-3 or CEA and age, menopausal status, and initial tumor size or nodal status. The combination of the elevated values of CA 15-3 and CEA was more sensitive than CA 15-3 alone (P = .04), but there were no significant improvements when subgroups were considered. Significant differences, that depended on which specific organ was affected dominantly by metastases, were seen in the mean levels of CA 15-3 antigen. Similarly, patients with liver involvement had higher mean levels of CA 15-3 than those without hepatic metastases. A stepwise regression analysis of the dominant site of metastases, liver involvement, and estimated extent of disease showed that only the latter parameter retained a significant correlation with CA 15-3 antigen levels (P less than .0001). Median survival of patients who showed abnormal CA 15-3 levels was significantly shorter than that of patients with nonelevated CA 15-3 (10.1 versus 18.0 months, P = .04). This difference was not appreciated with CEA levels (10.2 versus 12.2 months, P = .4). We conclude that tumor marker levels in patients with advanced breast carcinoma correlate with the extent of metastatic disease. In addition, the CA 15-3 assay is more sensitive and correlates more accurately with the extent of disease than CEA. Finally, the observed CA 15-3 differences by organ involvement are related to the extent of disease variations. The objective evaluation of the extent of metastatic disease provides a new approach in the study and comparison of breast cancer-associated tumor markers.
在173例晚期乳腺癌患者中,研究了转移病灶范围对循环中CA 15 - 3和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平的影响。通过一种客观的任意评分标准来评估转移病灶的范围。采集血清样本后对患者进行临床观察,并记录生存期。130例患者CA 15 - 3值升高(大于40 U/ml),97例患者CEA值升高(大于5 ng/ml)(75%对56%,P小于0.0001)。CA 15 - 3值升高与转移病灶的估计范围(P小于0.0001)、转移灶数量(P = 0.0006)以及研究开始后的生存期(P = 0.01)相关。CEA值升高与疾病范围相关(P小于0.0001),但与转移灶数量或生存期无关。未发现CA 15 - 3或CEA值升高与年龄、绝经状态、初始肿瘤大小或淋巴结状态之间存在相关性。CA 15 - 3和CEA值均升高的联合检测比单独检测CA 15 - 3更敏感(P = 0.04),但在考虑亚组时无显著改善。CA 15 - 3抗原的平均水平在转移主要累及的特定器官不同时存在显著差异。同样,有肝脏转移的患者CA 15 - 3平均水平高于无肝脏转移者。对转移的主要部位、肝脏受累情况和疾病估计范围进行逐步回归分析显示,只有后者参数与CA 15 - 3抗原水平保持显著相关性(P小于0.0001)。CA 15 - 3水平异常的患者中位生存期显著短于CA 15 - 3水平正常的患者(10.1个月对18.0个月,P = 0.04)。CEA水平未显示出这种差异(10.2个月对12.2个月,P = 0.4)。我们得出结论,晚期乳腺癌患者的肿瘤标志物水平与转移病灶范围相关。此外,CA 15 - 3检测比CEA更敏感,且与疾病范围的相关性更准确。最后,观察到的CA 15 - 3因器官受累情况的差异与疾病范围的变化有关。对转移病灶范围的客观评估为乳腺癌相关肿瘤标志物的研究和比较提供了一种新方法。