Lighting Research Center, School of Architecture, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.
The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Behav Sleep Med. 2020 Mar-Apr;18(2):226-240. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2018.1557189. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
: This study investigated whether light delivered through the eyelids of sleeping persons might create phase delay in older adults who are adversely affected by advanced sleep phase disorder. : Thirty-two cognitively intact, community-dwelling participants aged ≥ 50 years (20 females, 12 males) with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores ≥ 5 (poor sleep) completed the study. : This within-subjects, randomized, two-treatment crossover design study exposed participants to an active "blue" (λ = 480 nm) lighting intervention or a placebo "red" (λ = 640 nm) control through closed eyelids during sleep for 8 weeks. Conditions were administered 1 hr after bedtime using custom-built light masks delivering a train of 2-s duration light pulses presented every 30 s for ≤ 2 hr (approximately 240 pulses/night). Dependent variables were subjective measures of sleep and depression (questionnaires) and objective measures of sleep (wrist actigraphy), analyzed using linear mixed models with treatment, period, and carryover as fixed effects. : The actigraphy analysis found no effect of the intervention or the control condition on sleep start time, total sleep time, number of sleep bouts, or sleep efficiency, either compared to baseline or to one another. Subjective responses of study participants, however, indicated statistically significant ( < 0.05) improvement in seven of eight reported measures of sleep quality with both the intervention and the control condition, but no difference between the two conditions. : The participants reported improvement in sleep quality, but the intervention did not confer additional advantages after adjusting for period and carryover effects.
这项研究旨在探讨在受睡眠时相提前症影响的老年人中,通过眼睑传递的光线是否会导致相位延迟。
32 名认知正常、居住在社区的 50 岁及以上参与者(20 名女性,12 名男性),匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分≥5(睡眠质量差),完成了这项研究。
这项单盲、随机、两处理交叉设计的研究,在睡眠期间通过闭合的眼睑使参与者暴露于主动的“蓝色”(λ=480nm)照明干预或安慰剂“红色”(λ=640nm)对照下 8 周。使用定制的光面罩,在就寝后 1 小时内以 2 秒的时长施加光脉冲,每 30 秒呈现一次,持续时间不超过 2 小时(每晚约 240 个脉冲),进行条件处理。使用线性混合模型,以治疗、周期和延续性为固定效应,对睡眠和抑郁的主观测量(问卷)和睡眠的客观测量(腕动图)进行分析。
动图分析发现,与基线或彼此相比,干预或对照条件对睡眠起始时间、总睡眠时间、睡眠次数或睡眠效率均无影响。然而,研究参与者的主观反应表明,在睡眠质量的八个报告指标中,有七个指标有统计学意义(<0.05)的改善,无论是干预还是对照条件,但两种条件之间没有差异。
参与者报告睡眠质量有所改善,但在调整周期和延续效应后,干预并未带来额外优势。