• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护涂层对乳牙中传统玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏的影响:一项研究。

Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An study.

作者信息

Vishnurekha C, Annamalai Sankar, Baghkomeh Parisa Norouzi, Ditto Sharmin D

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kelambakkam, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sathyabama Dental College and Hospital, Kelambakkam, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;29(6):744-748. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17.

DOI:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17
PMID:30589002
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effect of protective coating G-Coat Plus on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in primary molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 samples were divided into four groups with 30 samples in each group. Group A - teeth restored with CGIC. Group B - teeth restored with CGIC coated with G-Coat Plus. Group C - teeth restored with RMGIC. Group D - teeth restored with RMGIC coated with G-Coat Plus. Microleakage was tested using 2% basic fuschin dye penetration and measured at ×40 original magnification under the stereomicroscope.

RESULTS

The results of this in vitro study showed that coating with G-Coat Plus showed a reduction in microleakage in CGIC and complete absence of microleakage in RMGIC when compared to the noncoated groups, which was statistically significant. CGIC without G-Coat Plus showed highest microleakage followed by RMGIC without G-Coat Plus, followed by a relatively less microleakage in CGIC with G-Coat Plus.

CONCLUSION

Significant reduction in microleakage was seen in conventional GIC and RMGIC with G-Coat Plus when compared to conventional GIC and RMGIC without G-Coat Plus.

摘要

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估和比较保护涂层G-Coat Plus对乳牙中传统玻璃离子水门汀(CGIC)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)微渗漏的影响。

材料与方法

总共120个样本被分为四组,每组30个样本。A组——用CGIC修复的牙齿。B组——用涂有G-Coat Plus的CGIC修复的牙齿。C组——用RMGIC修复的牙齿。D组——用涂有G-Coat Plus的RMGIC修复的牙齿。使用2%碱性品红染料渗透测试微渗漏,并在体视显微镜下以×40原始放大倍数进行测量。

结果

本体外研究结果表明,与未涂层组相比,涂有G-Coat Plus可使CGIC的微渗漏减少,RMGIC完全无微渗漏,差异具有统计学意义。未使用G-Coat Plus的CGIC微渗漏最高,其次是未使用G-Coat Plus的RMGIC,然后是使用G-Coat Plus的CGIC微渗漏相对较少。

结论

与未使用G-Coat Plus的传统GIC和RMGIC相比,使用G-Coat Plus的传统GIC和RMGIC微渗漏显著减少。

相似文献

1
Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An study.保护涂层对乳牙中传统玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏的影响:一项研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;29(6):744-748. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17.
2
Microleakage patterns of glass ionomer cement at cement-band and cement-enamel interfaces in primary teeth.乳牙中玻璃离子水门汀在水门汀-牙本质界和水门汀-釉质界的微渗漏模式。
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Mar-Apr;31(2):291-296. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_850_19.
3
Effect of protective coating agents on microleakage and flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer. an in vitro study.保护涂料对玻璃离子水门汀和氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏和弯曲强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00853-8. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.卡波姆/氟磷灰石增强玻璃离子水门汀在乳牙修复中微渗漏的比较评估
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;17(3):227-233.
5
Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.钬铬:钇-钪-镓石榴石激光照射制备的乳牙窝洞玻璃离子修复体的微渗漏
J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 May-Aug;75(2):151-7.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Fiber-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations Immersed in Three Different Beverages: Study.三种不同饮料浸泡下纤维增强型玻璃离子水门汀与传统玻璃离子水门汀修复体微渗漏的比较评价:研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):346-353. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3669.
7
Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.不锈钢冠用粘结性和非粘结性粘结水门汀的微渗漏
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):501-4.
8
Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.正畸带粘结剂在粘结剂-牙釉质和粘结剂-带界面处的微渗漏。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.025.
9
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of conventional and modifications of glass ionomer cement in primary teeth: An in vitro study.乳牙中传统玻璃离子水门汀与改良玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;33(4):279-84. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.165662.
10
Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An Study.使用染料渗透法评估用牙齿颜色材料修复的乳牙的微渗漏:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jul 1;20(7):778-782.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Bioactive, Ormocer, and Conventional GIC Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Microleakage of Three Restorative Materials.乳牙中生物活性玻璃陶瓷、有机硅陶瓷和传统玻璃离子水门汀修复材料微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究 三种修复材料的微渗漏情况
Int J Dent. 2022 Mar 11;2022:7932930. doi: 10.1155/2022/7932930. eCollection 2022.