• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜内补片植入术——患者队列分析

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh - an analysis of the patients cohort.

作者信息

Kohoutek L, Plecháčová P, Roxer R, Musil J, Karkošková B

出版信息

Rozhl Chir. 2018 Summer;97(10):459-463.

PMID:30590930
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernias represent one of the most complex and widely discussed issues of abdominal wall surgery. 10-20% of the cases occur following abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to describe our surgical experience and determine whether the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) procedure is suitable for hernia surgery with minimal postoperative complications.

METHOD

The paper focuses on patients operated on by the IPOM technique between 2015 and 2016. The group involved 53 patients with median or paramedian defects after acute or elective abdominal surgery. In patients with comorbidities, thorough preoperative examination was completed including abdominal ultrasound, colonoscopy and spirometry. In the postoperative period, we evaluated pain using the visual analogue scale, wound healing, relapses and patient´s satisfaction with functional as well as aesthetic outcomes of the surgery.

RESULTS

Our group comprised 53 patients operated on using the IPOM technique. They were 4879 years old with a body mass index exceeding 30 kg/m2. 18 patients had a paramedian hernia and 35 patients median hernia. 4 patients suffered a perioperative iatrogenic injury of the intestine, 8 cases developed postoperative paralytic ileus. Wound infection or infection of the mesh was not recorded. 2 patients with hernia recurrence were followed up for one year.

CONCLUSIONS

Incisional hernias represent an important surgical issue. Management is often complex. IPOM as the treatment of choice for patients with incisional hernias appears to be beneficial. However, it requires careful patient selection, patient preparation for surgery and their compliance, the surgeons extensive experience as well as excellent postoperative care with limited postoperative pain. The success rate of this method is high in carefully selected patients. Key words: IPOM - incisional hernia - patient compliance.

摘要

引言

切口疝是腹壁外科最复杂且讨论最广泛的问题之一。10% - 20%的病例发生于腹部手术后。本研究的目的是描述我们的手术经验,并确定腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM)是否适用于疝修补手术,同时使术后并发症最少。

方法

本文重点关注2015年至2016年期间采用IPOM技术进行手术的患者。该组包括53例在急性或择期腹部手术后出现正中或旁正中缺损的患者。对于合并其他疾病的患者,完成了全面的术前检查,包括腹部超声、结肠镜检查和肺活量测定。在术后期间,我们使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛情况、伤口愈合情况、复发情况以及患者对手术功能和美学效果的满意度。

结果

我们的研究组包括53例采用IPOM技术进行手术的患者。他们的年龄在48 - 79岁之间,体重指数超过30kg/m²。18例患者患有旁正中疝,35例患者患有正中疝。4例患者在围手术期发生了医源性肠损伤,8例患者出现了术后麻痹性肠梗阻。未记录到伤口感染或补片感染情况。对2例疝复发患者进行了为期一年的随访。

结论

切口疝是一个重要的外科问题。其治疗通常较为复杂。IPOM作为切口疝患者的首选治疗方法似乎是有益的。然而,这需要仔细选择患者、让患者做好手术准备并确保其依从性,需要外科医生有丰富的经验以及提供出色的术后护理,同时使术后疼痛有限。在精心挑选的患者中,这种方法的成功率较高。关键词:IPOM - 切口疝 - 患者依从性

相似文献

1
Intraperitoneal onlay mesh - an analysis of the patients cohort.腹膜内补片植入术——患者队列分析
Rozhl Chir. 2018 Summer;97(10):459-463.
2
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
3
Is laparoscopic treatment of incisional and recurrent hernias associated with an increased risk for complications?腹腔镜治疗切口疝和复发性疝是否会增加并发症的风险?
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.046. Epub 2015 May 30.
4
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
5
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
6
Hybrid NOTES transvaginal intraperitoneal onlay mesh in abdominal wall hernias: an alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures.杂交NOTES经阴道腹膜内补片修补腹壁疝:传统腹腔镜手术的替代方法
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3712-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4141-x. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
8
Intraperitoneal alloplasty combined with the anterior separation technique in giant incisional hernias.腹腔内同种异体成形术联合前路分离技术治疗巨大切口疝
Pol Przegl Chir. 2018 Dec 10;91(1):1-5. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7798.
9
Parastomal Hernia Repair with a 3D Funnel Intraperitoneal Mesh Device and Same-Sided Stoma Relocation: Results of 56 Cases.使用 3D 漏斗状腹腔内补片装置和同侧造口转移修复造口旁疝:56 例结果。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3212-3217. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4130-4.
10
Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch for primary and incisional hernia repair.派利特斯复合补片® 用于原发性和切口疝修补。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;93(7-8):1799-1805. doi: 10.1111/ans.18524. Epub 2023 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Pfannenstiel incision versus iliac fossa incision for retrieval of resected specimen after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a prospective randomised parallel arm study.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术后经Pfannenstiel切口与髂窝切口取出切除标本的比较:一项前瞻性随机平行对照研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04528-9.