Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore; Psychotherapy Service, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore; Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 May;20(5):629-633.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
Brief screening scales for caregiver burden are much needed in routine dementia services to efficiently identify caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) for further intervention. Although the 22-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is often used, its available screening versions have not performed as well as the full version in distinguishing significant burden. We developed a brief screening scale that is valid and comparable to ZBI in distinguishing caregiver burden.
Baseline data of an ongoing cohort study.
Family careivers of community-dwelling PWD (n = 394).
Participants completed questionnaires containing ZBI and other caregiving scales. Initially, we split the study samples into 2-the derivation sample (n = 215) was used to develop a brief scale that best distinguishes significant burden (using the best-subset approach with 10-fold cross-validation), whereas the validation sample (n = 179) verified its actual performance in distinguishing significant burden. We then evaluated the derived scale in its internal consistency reliability, factorial validity, known group validity, and construct validity, and mapped the scores between the brief scale and ZBI using the equipercentile equating method.
We derived a 3-item scale which had comparable performance to ZBI in distinguishing significant burden (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.92). It had a single dimension in exploratory factor analysis and maintained good psychometric properties similar to those of ZBI. It also explained 77.8% of the variability in ZBI, and had scores that could be mapped to ZBI with reasonable precision.
We have derived a highly accessible tool to screen for caregiver burden, which can have a wider health system effect of expanding the reach of caregiver-focused interventions to services involved in the care of PWD. Notably, this screening tool was developed using rigorous methods and demonstrated comparability to ZBI in its validity, reliability, and total scores.
在常规痴呆症服务中,非常需要简短的照顾者负担筛查量表,以便有效地识别痴呆症患者(PWD)的照顾者,以便进一步干预。尽管经常使用 22 项 Zarit 负担访谈(ZBI),但其可用的筛查版本在区分显著负担方面的表现不如完整版本。我们开发了一种简短的筛查量表,在区分照顾者负担方面与 ZBI 具有相同的有效性和可比性。
正在进行的队列研究的基线数据。
社区居住的 PWD 的家庭照顾者(n=394)。
参与者完成了包含 ZBI 和其他照顾者量表的问卷。最初,我们将研究样本分为 2 组 - 推导样本(n=215)用于开发最佳区分显著负担的简短量表(使用 10 倍交叉验证的最佳子集方法),而验证样本(n=179)验证其在区分显著负担方面的实际表现。然后,我们评估了推导量表的内部一致性可靠性、因子有效性、已知组有效性和结构有效性,并使用等百分位等距法将简表和 ZBI 的分数进行映射。
我们得出了一个 3 项量表,在区分显著负担方面与 ZBI 具有相当的性能(接受者操作特征曲线下面积 0.86,95%置信区间 0.81-0.92)。它在探索性因子分析中有一个单一维度,保持了与 ZBI 相似的良好心理测量特性。它还解释了 ZBI 变异的 77.8%,并且具有可以与 ZBI 映射的分数,具有合理的精度。
我们已经开发出一种高度便捷的工具来筛查照顾者负担,这可以对卫生系统产生更广泛的影响,将以照顾者为重点的干预措施扩大到参与 PWD 护理的服务中。值得注意的是,这个筛查工具是使用严格的方法开发的,并且在其有效性、可靠性和总分方面与 ZBI 具有可比性。