Suppr超能文献

不同抗凝剂对糖化白蛋白定量检测的影响。

Effects of different anticoagulants on glycated albumin quantification.

机构信息

Central Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Instrumentation Laboratory - A Werfen Company, R&D Department, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Feb 15;29(1):010901. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.010901. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the last 20 years glycated albumin (GA) measurement has been demonstrated to be a reliable glycation marker and recently as the most innovative one in western countries. Glycated albumin has been already adopted by some Asian countries due to its usefulness in diabetes screening. The aim of the present study was to investigate for the first time the effects of different anticoagulants on GA assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From each of 60 patients a serum tube and KEDTA, Li-Heparin and NaF-EDTA containing tubes were collected. All tubes were from Sarstedt (Verona, Italy). Glycated albumin was measured in duplicate in each sample tube in a single analytical run with quantILab glycated albumin (Instrumentation Laboratory SpA - A Werfen Company, Milan, Italy) on Architect c8000 analyser (Abbott SRL, Rome, Italy). Comparison of GA% in evaluated tubes was made by paired Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

Median and interquartile range GA% concentrations were 15.4% (13.2 - 19.1) in serum, 15.7% (13.6 - 19.9) in KEDTA, 15.6% (13.3 - 19.7) in Li-heparin and 15.5% (13.1 - 19.3) in NaF-EDTA samples, respectively. Glycated albumin mean relative bias respect to serum was within desirable bias derived from biological variation studies (± 2.9%) when KEDTA (+ 2.8%), Li-heparin (+ 0.9%) or NaF-EDTA (+ 0.1%), were used as anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the GA% assay is not affected by relevant interferences when KEDTA, Li-heparin or NaF-EDTA are used as anticoagulants, so they can be used interchangeably without a relevant impact on the clinical use of the test.

摘要

简介

在过去的 20 年中,糖化白蛋白(GA)的测量已被证明是一种可靠的糖化标志物,最近在西方国家也是最具创新性的标志物之一。由于其在糖尿病筛查中的有用性,一些亚洲国家已经采用了糖化白蛋白。本研究的目的是首次研究不同抗凝剂对 GA 测定的影响。

材料和方法

从 60 名患者中分别采集血清管和 KEDTA、Li-Heparin 和 NaF-EDTA 抗凝管。所有试管均来自 Sarstedt(意大利维罗纳)。在单个分析运行中,使用 quantILab 糖化白蛋白(Instrumentation Laboratory SpA-A Werfen 公司,米兰,意大利)在 Architect c8000 分析仪(Abbott SRL,罗马,意大利)上重复测量每个样本管中的糖化白蛋白。通过配对 Wilcoxon 检验比较评估管中的 GA%。

结果

血清、KEDTA、Li-Heparin 和 NaF-EDTA 样本中 GA%浓度的中位数和四分位间距分别为 15.4%(13.2-19.1)、15.7%(13.6-19.9)、15.6%(13.3-19.7)和 15.5%(13.1-19.3)。当使用 KEDTA(+2.8%)、Li-Heparin(+0.9%)或 NaF-EDTA(+0.1%)作为抗凝剂时,GA%的平均相对偏差与血清相比在生物学变异研究中得出的理想偏差范围内(±2.9%)。

结论

我们的结果表明,当使用 KEDTA、Li-Heparin 或 NaF-EDTA 作为抗凝剂时,GA%测定不受相关干扰的影响,因此可以互换使用,而不会对试验的临床应用产生重大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2799/6294155/4b7a5853fd0d/bm-29-1-010901-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验