Riva Laura, Dubuisson Jean
CIIL-Centre d'Infection et d'Immunité de Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR 8204, Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1911:33-45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8976-8_2.
For a long time, the study of the HCV infectious cycle has been a major challenge for researchers because of the difficulties in generating an efficient cell culture system leading to a productive viral infection. The development of HCVpp and later on HCVcc model allowing for functional studies of HCV in cell culture completely revolutionized HCV research. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with a brief overview of the development of these two models. We describe the advantages of each model as well as their limitations in the study of the HCV life cycle, with a particular emphasis on virus entry. A comparison between these two models is presented in terms of virion composition and their use as tools for the characterization of entry factors, envelope glycoprotein functions, and antibody neutralization. We also compare the production and biosafety level of these two types of viral particles. Globally, this review provides a general description of the most adequate applications for HCVpp and HCVcc in HCV research.
长期以来,由于难以建立能产生有效病毒感染的高效细胞培养系统,丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染周期的研究一直是研究人员面临的重大挑战。HCVpp以及后来的HCVcc模型的开发,使得在细胞培养中对HCV进行功能研究,彻底改变了HCV研究。本综述的目的是向读者简要概述这两种模型的发展。我们描述了每种模型的优点以及它们在HCV生命周期研究中的局限性,特别强调了病毒进入过程。从病毒粒子组成以及它们作为表征进入因子、包膜糖蛋白功能和抗体中和作用工具的用途方面,对这两种模型进行了比较。我们还比较了这两种类型病毒颗粒的生产和生物安全水平。总体而言,本综述对HCVpp和HCVcc在HCV研究中的最适用应用进行了一般性描述。