Cleveland Clinic, Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave. P77, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Merck & Co., Inc., Center for Observational and Real World Evidence, 2000 Galloping Hill Rd., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, United States.
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.042. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
To determine the incidence burden and associated risk factors of residual neuromuscular block (rNMB) during routine U.S. hospital care.
Blinded multicenter cohort study.
Operating and recovery rooms of ten community and academic U.S. hospitals.
Two-hundred fifty-five adults, ASA PS 1-3, underwent elective abdominal surgery with general anesthesia and ≥1 dose of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) for endotracheal intubation and/or maintenance of NMB between August 2012 and April 2013.
TOF measurements using acceleromyography were performed on patients already receiving routine anesthetic care for elective open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Measurements allowed assessment of the presence of residual neuromuscular block (rNMB), defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio <0.9 at tracheal extubation. We recorded patient and procedural characteristics and assessed TOF ratios (T4/T1) at various times throughout the procedure and at tracheal extubation. Differences in patient and clinical characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression assessed risk factors associated with rNMB at extubation.
Most of the study population, 64.7% (n = 165) had rNMB (TOF ratio < 0.9), among them, 31.0% with TOF ratio <0.6. Among those receiving neostigmine and/or qualitative peripheral nerve stimulation per clinical decision, 65.0% had rNMB. After controlling for confounders, we observed male gender (odds ratio: 2.60, P = 0.008), higher BMI (odds ratio: 1.04/unit, P = 0.043), and surgery at a community hospital (odds ratio: 3.15, P = 0.006) to be independently associated with increased odds of rNMB.
Assessing TOF ratios blinded to the care team, we found that the majority of patients (64.7%) in this study had rNMB at tracheal extubation, despite neostigmine administration and qualitative peripheral nerve stimulation used for routine clinical care. Qualitative neuromuscular monitoring and clinical judgement often fails to detect rNMB after neostigmine reversal with potential severe consequences to the patient. Our data suggests that clinical care could be improved by considering quantitative neuromuscular monitoring for routine care.
确定美国常规医院护理中残余神经肌肉阻滞(rNMB)的发生率负担和相关风险因素。
盲法多中心队列研究。
美国 10 家社区和学术医院的手术室和恢复室。
255 名 ASA PS 1-3 级的成年人,接受全身麻醉下的择期腹部手术,在气管插管和/或维持非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)期间使用了 1 次或多次 NMBA。
使用肌动描记法对已经接受常规麻醉护理的接受择期开放或腹腔镜腹部手术的患者进行肌松监测。测量结果允许评估残余神经肌肉阻滞(rNMB)的存在,定义为气管拔管时肌颤搐比值(TOF)<0.9。我们记录了患者和手术过程的特点,并在整个手术过程中和气管拔管时评估了不同时间的 TOF 比值(T4/T1)。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类变量和 t 检验比较连续变量的患者和临床特征差异。多变量逻辑回归评估与拔管时 rNMB 相关的风险因素。
大多数研究人群(64.7%,n=165)存在 rNMB(TOF 比值<0.9),其中 31.0%的患者 TOF 比值<0.6。根据临床决策接受新斯的明和/或定性外周神经刺激的患者中,有 65.0%存在 rNMB。在控制混杂因素后,我们观察到男性(比值比:2.60,P=0.008)、较高的 BMI(比值比:每单位 1.04,P=0.043)和在社区医院进行手术(比值比:3.15,P=0.006)与 rNMB 的发生几率增加独立相关。
在对护理团队进行盲法评估 TOF 比值后,我们发现尽管使用新斯的明和定性外周神经刺激进行常规临床护理,但本研究中的大多数患者(64.7%)在气管拔管时仍存在 rNMB。新斯的明逆转后,定性神经肌肉监测和临床判断往往无法检测到 rNMB,这可能对患者造成严重后果。我们的数据表明,通过考虑常规护理中使用定量神经肌肉监测,可以改善临床护理。