National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Centre of Research Excellence Frailty Trans-disciplinary Research To Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Centre of Research Excellence Frailty Trans-disciplinary Research To Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Prev Med. 2019 Feb;119:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.020. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults.
随着老年人寿命的延长,医疗服务提供者越来越关注衰弱及其对健康和福祉的重大影响。因此,衰弱筛查作为一种可能的健康政策措施,以解决如何预防衰弱的发生和进展的问题,已经引起了广泛关注。然而,谁应该接受衰弱筛查,在何处以及何时进行筛查,仍然是一个广泛争论的问题。本文叙述性综述的目的是参照威尔逊和荣格经时间考验和广泛接受的社区环境中可接受筛查的原则,探讨这一问题的各个方面。尽管支持衰弱筛查的新兴证据具有很大的希望,但证据基础仍存在显著差距。因此,根据威尔逊和荣格的原则进行评估,广泛的人群筛查似乎没有得到证据的支持。然而,为了发现病例而进行筛查,可能对老年人有用。