• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 PERSSILAA 筛查途径识别社区居住的体弱老年人:方法学指南和在荷兰大规模部署的结果。

Identification of community-dwelling older adults at risk of frailty using the PERSSILAA screening pathway: a methodological guide and results of a large-scale deployment in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, 7522, AL, Enschede, The Netherlands.

University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Telemedicine group, Enschede, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 May 3;19(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6876-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-6876-0
PMID:31053090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among community-dwelling older adults, frailty is highly prevalent and recognized as a major public health concern. To prevent frailty it is important to identify those at risk of becoming frail, but at present, no accepted screening procedure is available.

METHODS

The screening process developed as part of the PERSSILAA project is a two-step screening pathway. First, older adults are asked to complete a self-screening questionnaire to assess their general health status and their level of decline on physical, cognitive and nutritional domains. Second, older adults who, according to step one, are at risk of becoming frail, are invited for a face-to-face assessment focusing on the domains in depth. We deployed the PERSSILAA screening procedure in primary care in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

In total, baseline data were available for 3777 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 69.9 (SD ± 3.8)) who completed first step screening. Based on predefined cut-off scores, 16.8% of the sample were classified as frail (n = 634), 20.6% as pre-frail (n = 777), and 62.3% as robust (n = 2353). Frail subjects were referred back to their GP without going through the second step. Of the pre-frail older adults, 69.7% had evidence of functional decline on the physical domain, 67% were overweight or obese and 31.0% had evidence of cognitive decline.

CONCLUSION

Pre-frailty is common among community-dwelling older adults. The PERSSILAA screening approach is a multi-factor, two-step screening process, potentially useful for primary prevention to identify those at risk of frailty and who will benefit most from preventive strategies.

摘要

背景

在社区居住的老年人中,衰弱症的发病率很高,被认为是一个主要的公共卫生问题。为了预防衰弱症,识别那些有衰弱风险的人是很重要的,但目前还没有公认的筛查程序。

方法

作为 PERSSILAA 项目的一部分开发的筛选过程是一个两步筛选途径。首先,要求老年人完成自我筛选问卷,以评估他们的一般健康状况以及身体、认知和营养领域的衰退程度。其次,根据第一步,那些有衰弱风险的老年人将被邀请进行面对面的评估,重点关注这些领域。我们在荷兰的初级保健中部署了 PERSSILAA 筛选程序。

结果

共有 3777 名居住在社区的老年人(平均年龄 69.9(±3.8))完成了第一步的筛选,他们提供了基线数据。根据预先设定的截断分数,16.8%的样本被归类为衰弱(n=634),20.6%为衰弱前期(n=777),62.3%为强健(n=2353)。衰弱的患者被直接转回他们的家庭医生,而不需要进行第二步评估。在衰弱前期的老年人中,69.7%在身体领域有功能下降的证据,67%超重或肥胖,31.0%有认知能力下降的证据。

结论

衰弱前期在社区居住的老年人中很常见。PERSSILAA 筛选方法是一种多因素、两步筛选过程,可能对初级预防有用,以识别那些有衰弱风险的人,并使他们从预防策略中获益最多。

相似文献

1
Identification of community-dwelling older adults at risk of frailty using the PERSSILAA screening pathway: a methodological guide and results of a large-scale deployment in the Netherlands.使用 PERSSILAA 筛查途径识别社区居住的体弱老年人:方法学指南和在荷兰大规模部署的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 3;19(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6876-0.
2
Frailty Screening in the Community Using the FRAIL Scale.社区中使用 FRAIL 量表进行虚弱筛查。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 May 1;16(5):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
How to Manage Frail Older Adults in the Community? Proposal of a Health Promotion Program Experienced in a City of 16,638 Inhabitants in France.如何在社区管理体弱的老年人?法国一个拥有16638名居民的城市所实施的健康促进项目提案。
J Frailty Aging. 2018;7(2):120-126. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2017.47.
4
Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains.衰弱的Fried表型:三个衰弱阶段在不同健康领域的横断面比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Jul 9;15:77. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0078-0.
5
Differential association of frailty with cognitive decline and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.社区居住老年人中衰弱与认知功能下降和肌肉减少症的差异关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Feb;16(2):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Association between comprehensive health literacy and frailty level in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study in Japan.社区居住老年人综合健康素养与衰弱水平之间的关联:日本的一项横断面研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 May;17(5):804-809. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12793. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Health-Related Problems and Changes After 1 Year as Assessed With the Geriatric ICF Core Set (GeriatrICS) in Community-Living Older Adults Who Are Frail Receiving Person-Centered and Integrated Care From Embrace.在接受拥抱提供的以患者为中心和整合照护的社区居住的体弱老年人中,使用老年综合评估国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集(GeriatrICS)评估 1 年后,与健康相关的问题和变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Dec;100(12):2334-2345. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
8
Impact of nutritional status according to GLIM criteria on the risk of incident frailty and mortality in community-dwelling older adults.根据 GLIM 标准的营养状况对社区居住的老年人发生虚弱和死亡的风险的影响。
Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.032. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Nutritional risk and adverse health outcomes in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: A study based on the Elderly Nutritional Indicators for Geriatric Malnutrition Assessment (ENIGMA).中国社区老年人的营养风险与不良健康结局:基于老年人营养不良评估的营养指标(ENIGMA)的研究。
Nutrition. 2024 Oct;126:112489. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112489. Epub 2024 May 3.
10
Instruments to assess sarcopenia and physical frailty in older people living in a community (care) setting: similarities and discrepancies.用于评估社区(护理)环境中老年人肌肉减少症和身体虚弱的工具:异同点
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Apr;16(4):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Outcomes in Frail Older Community-Dwellers in Western Australia: Results from the Community Assessment of Risk Screening and Treatment Strategies (CARTS) Programme.预测西澳大利亚州体弱老年社区居民的预后:社区风险筛查与治疗策略评估(CARTS)项目的结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;12(13):1339. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131339.
2
Frailty in an Adult Acute Hospital Population: Predictors, Prevalence, and Outcomes.成人急性医院人群中的衰弱:预测因素、患病率和结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;21(3):273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030273.
3
Design and Evaluation of Personalized Services to Foster Active Aging: The Experience of Technology Pre-Validation in Italian Pilots.个性化服务设计与评估促进积极老龄化:意大利试点中的技术预验证经验。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;23(2):797. doi: 10.3390/s23020797.
4
Oral Health and Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the Northern Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Study.荷兰北部社区居住的老年人的口腔健康与虚弱状况:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137654.
5
Perspectives of older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers on frailty screening in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.老年人、护理人员、医疗保健提供者对初级保健中衰弱筛查的看法:系统评价和定性荟萃综合。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03173-6.
6
Interactions Between EIP on AHA Reference Sites and Action Groups to Foster Digital Innovation of Health and Care in European Regions.AHA 参考网站上的 EIP 与行动小组之间的互动,以促进欧洲地区健康和护理的数字创新。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Apr 2;17:343-358. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S323723. eCollection 2022.
7
The Importance of Taking a Patient-Centered, Community-Based Approach to Preventing and Managing Frailty: A Public Health Perspective.从公共卫生角度看,采取以患者为中心、以社区为基础的方法来预防和管理虚弱的重要性。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;8:599170. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.599170. eCollection 2020.
8
Acceptance and Potential Impact of the eWALL Platform for Health Monitoring and Promotion in Persons with a Chronic Disease or Age-Related Impairment.接受和潜在影响的电子墙平台健康监测和促进的人患有慢性疾病或与年龄相关的损害。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 28;17(21):7893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217893.
9
Comparison of Frailty Screening Instruments in the Emergency Department.在急诊室中使用虚弱筛查工具的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 27;16(19):3626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193626.

本文引用的文献

1
Population screening, monitoring and surveillance for frailty: three systematic reviews and a grey literature review.针对衰弱的人群筛查、监测与 surveillance:三项系统评价及一项灰色文献综述。 (注:“surveillance”常见释义为“监视;监督” ,此处结合语境可能有更专业的医学相关特定含义,具体需根据上下文进一步确定准确中文表述 )
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018 Jul-Sep;54(3):253-262. doi: 10.4415/ANN_18_03_13.
2
Transitions and trajectories in frailty states over time: a systematic review of the European Joint Action ADVANTAGE.随着时间推移,脆弱状态的转变与轨迹:对欧洲联合行动ADVANTAGE的系统评价
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018 Jul-Sep;54(3):246-252. doi: 10.4415/ANN_18_03_12.
3
Prevalence of frailty at population level in European ADVANTAGE Joint Action Member States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲ADVANTAGE联合行动成员国人群层面虚弱的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018 Jul-Sep;54(3):226-238. doi: 10.4415/ANN_18_03_10.
4
The Reliability of Using Tablet Technology for Screening the Health of Older Adults.使用平板电脑技术筛查老年人健康状况的可靠性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:651-655.
5
Frailty screening and assessment tools: a review of characteristics and use in Public Health.衰弱筛查与评估工具:公共卫生领域的特征与应用综述
Ann Ig. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):128-139. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2204.
6
Prevention of Frailty in Aging.衰老过程中衰弱的预防
J Frailty Aging. 2017;6(4):174-177. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2017.42.
7
Predictive performance of four frailty screening tools in community-dwelling elderly.四种衰弱筛查工具在社区居住老年人中的预测性能。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 10;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0633-y.
8
An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness.社会隔离和孤独对公共健康影响的系统评价概述。
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:157-171. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.035. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study.在多廷赫姆队列研究中探索的虚弱的四领域方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0.
10
How clinical practitioners assess frailty in their daily practice: an international survey.临床从业者在日常实践中如何评估虚弱:一项国际调查。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):905-912. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0806-8. Epub 2017 Aug 2.