Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac Street 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 830, Boston, MA 02114, United States; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115-5899, United States.
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;89:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
Despite equivalent or lower lifetime and past-year prevalence of mental disorder among racial/ethnic minorities compared to non-Latino Whites in the United States, evidence suggests that mental disorders are more persistent among minorities than non-Latino Whites. But, it is unclear how nativity and socioeconomic status contribute to observed racial/ethnic differences in prevalence and persistence of mood, anxiety, and substance disorders.
Data were examined from a coordinated series of four national surveys that together assessed 21,024 Asian, non-Latino Black, Latino, and non-Latino White adults between 2001 and 2003. Common DSM-IV mood, anxiety, and substance disorders were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Logistic regression analyses examined how several predictors (e.g., race/ethnicity, nativity, education, income) and the interactions between those predictors were associated with both 12-month disorder prevalence and 12-month prevalence among lifetime cases. For the second series of analyses, age of onset and time since onset were used as additional control variables to indirectly estimate disorder persistence.
Non-Latino Whites demonstrated the highest unadjusted 12-month prevalence of all disorder types (p < 0.001), though differences were also observed across minority groups. In contrast, Asian, Latino, and Black adults demonstrated higher 12-month prevalence of mood disorders among lifetime cases than Whites (p < 0.001) prior to adjustments Once we introduced nativity and other relevant controls (e.g., age, sex, urbanicity), US-born Whites with at least one US-born parent demonstrated higher 12-month mood disorder prevalence than foreign-born Whites or US-born Whites with two foreign parents (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = [0.36, 0.73]); this group also demonstrated higher odds of past-year mood disorder than Asian (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = [0.42, 0.82]) and Black (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = [0.58, 0.83]) adults, but not Latino adults (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = [0.74, 1.06]). Racial/ethnic differences in 12-month mood and substance disorder prevalence were moderated by educational attainment, especially among adults without a college education. Additionally, racial/ethnic minority groups with no more than a high school education demonstrated more persistent mood and substance disorders than non-Latino Whites; these relationships reversed or disappeared at higher education levels.
Nativity may be a particularly relevant consideration for diagnosing mood disorder among non-Latino Whites; additionally, lower education appears to be associated with increased relative risk of persistent mood and substance use disorders among racial/ethnic minorities compared to non-Latino Whites.
尽管与非拉丁裔白人相比,美国的少数族裔在终身和过去一年的精神障碍患病率方面相当或更低,但有证据表明,少数族裔的精神障碍比非拉丁裔白人更持久。但是,尚不清楚原籍国和社会经济地位如何导致在心境、焦虑和物质障碍的患病率和持续性方面观察到的种族/民族差异。
本研究对来自四个全国性调查的协调系列数据进行了检查,这些调查共评估了 2001 年至 2003 年间的 21,024 名亚裔、非拉丁裔黑人、拉丁裔和非拉丁裔白人成年人。使用复合国际诊断访谈评估常见的 DSM-IV 心境、焦虑和物质障碍。逻辑回归分析检查了几种预测因素(例如,种族/民族、原籍国、教育程度、收入)以及这些预测因素之间的相互作用与 12 个月障碍患病率和终生病例中的 12 个月患病率之间的关系。对于第二系列分析,发病年龄和发病时间间隔被用作间接估计障碍持续性的附加控制变量。
非拉丁裔白人表现出所有障碍类型中未经调整的 12 个月患病率最高(p<0.001),尽管在少数族裔群体中也观察到差异。相比之下,亚裔、拉丁裔和黑人成年人在有终生病例的人中表现出比白人更高的心境障碍 12 个月患病率(p<0.001),而在调整了出生国和其他相关因素(例如年龄、性别、城市状况)后,至少有一位美国出生父母的美国出生白人表现出比外国出生的白人或有两位外国父母的美国出生白人更高的心境障碍 12 个月患病率(OR=0.51,95%CI=[0.36,0.73]);与亚裔(OR=0.59,95%CI=[0.42,0.82])和黑人(OR=0.70,95%CI=[0.58,0.83])成年人相比,这组成年人过去一年心境障碍的可能性也更高,但与拉丁裔成年人(OR=0.89,95%CI=[0.74,1.06])相比则没有更高。教育程度,特别是在没有大学学历的成年人中,调节了种族/民族在心境和物质障碍 12 个月患病率方面的差异。此外,受教育程度不高的少数族裔群体表现出比非拉丁裔白人更持久的心境和物质障碍;这些关系在更高的教育水平下发生逆转或消失。
原籍国对于诊断非拉丁裔白人群体的心境障碍可能是一个特别相关的考虑因素;此外,与非拉丁裔白人相比,较低的教育程度似乎与少数族裔中持续的心境和物质使用障碍的相对风险增加有关。