Vargas Sylvanna M, Sugarman Olivia K, Tang Lingqi, Miranda Jeanne, Chung Bowen
Departments of Psychology and Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Center for Health Services and Society, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
J Bisex. 2021;21(4):541-559. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2021.2024932. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
The current study uses an intersectional framework to examine subgroup differences in the prevalence of depression among a community sample of predominantly low-income, racial/ethnic and sexual minority adults. Between May 2017-June 2018, participants (N=1753) were recruited from and screened for depression in community organizations that predominantly serve sexual minority clients based in Los Angeles, California and New Orleans, Louisiana. Twenty-six percent of people screened for study eligibility met criteria for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8≥10). As is true in higher-resourced populations, bisexual (Odds Ratio; OR: 1.50; 95% Confidence Interval; CI: 1.08, 2.09) and queer/questioning (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.08, 3.19) individuals were more likely to be depressed than heterosexual and lesbian/ gay individuals. These differences remained even when accounting for income. No differences in depression were observed between lesbian/gay and heterosexual adults. In terms of racial differences, bisexual Black (OR: .47; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.04) and Hispanic (OR: .51; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.12) adults were marginally less likely to be depressed than bisexual White adults. No racial differences emerged across other sexual orientations. Differences across some sexual minority subgroups may be race-specific, suggesting that intersectional frameworks may be the best way to understand how multiple marginalization affects different subgroups.
本研究采用交叉性框架,以调查在一个以低收入、种族/族裔和性少数群体成年人为主的社区样本中,抑郁症患病率的亚组差异。在2017年5月至2018年6月期间,从加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市和路易斯安那州新奥尔良市主要为性少数群体客户服务的社区组织中招募了参与者(N = 1753),并对其进行抑郁症筛查。在接受研究资格筛查的人群中,26%的人符合抑郁症标准(患者健康问卷-8≥10)。与资源更丰富的人群情况相同,双性恋者(优势比;OR:1.50;95%置信区间;CI:1.08,2.09)和酷儿/性取向存疑者(OR:1.86;95% CI:1.08,3.19)比异性恋者和女同性恋者/男同性恋者更易患抑郁症。即便考虑到收入因素,这些差异依然存在。女同性恋者/男同性恋者和异性恋成年人在抑郁症方面未观察到差异。在种族差异方面,双性恋黑人成年人(OR:0.47;95% CI:0.21,1.04)和西班牙裔成年人(OR:0.51;95% CI:0.23,1.12)患抑郁症的可能性略低于双性恋白人成年人。在其他性取向中未出现种族差异。一些性少数群体亚组之间的差异可能具有种族特异性,这表明交叉性框架可能是理解多重边缘化如何影响不同亚组的最佳方式。