Case Anne, Deaton Angus
Center for Health and Wellbeing, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, and NBER.
Center for Health and Wellbeing, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, NBER, and University of Southern California.
Brookings Pap Econ Act. 2017 Spring;2017:397-476. doi: 10.1353/eca.2017.0005.
We build on and extend the findings in Case and Deaton (2015) on increases in mortality and morbidity among white non-Hispanic Americans in midlife since the turn of the century. Increases in all-cause mortality continued unabated to 2015, with additional increases in drug overdoses, suicides, and alcohol-related liver mortality, particularly among those with a high-school degree or less. The decline in mortality from heart disease has slowed and, most recently, stopped, and this combined with the three other causes is responsible for the increase in all-cause mortality. Not only are educational differences in mortality among whites increasing, but from 1998 to 2015 mortality for those without, and for those with, a college degree. This is true for non-Hispanic white men and women in all five year age groups from 35-39 through 55-59. Mortality rates among blacks and Hispanics continued to fall; in 1999, the mortality rate of white non-Hispanics aged 50-54 with only a high-school degree was 30 percent than the mortality rate of blacks in the same age group but irrespective of education; by 2015, it was 30 percent . There are similar crossovers in all age groups from 25-29 to 60-64. Mortality rates in comparable rich countries have continued their pre-millennial fall at the rates that used to characterize the US. In contrast to the US, mortality rates in Europe are falling for those with low levels of educational attainment, and have fallen further over this period than mortality rates for those with higher levels of education. Many commentators have suggested that poor mortality outcomes can be attributed to contemporaneous levels of resources, particularly to slowly growing, stagnant, and even declining incomes; we evaluate this possibility, but find that it cannot provide a comprehensive explanation. In particular, the income profiles for blacks and Hispanics, whose mortality rates have fallen, are no better than those for whites. Nor is there any evidence in the European data that mortality trends match income trends, in spite of sharply different patterns of median income across countries after the Great Recession. We propose a preliminary but plausible story in which from one birth cohort to the next, in the labor market, in marriage and child outcomes, and in health, is triggered by progressively worsening labor market opportunities at the time of entry for whites with low levels of education. This account, which fits much of the data, has the profoundly negative implication that policies, even ones that successfully improve earnings and jobs, or redistribute income, will take many years to reverse the mortality and morbidity increase, and that those in midlife now are likely to do much worse in old age than those currently older than 65. This is in contrast to an account in which resources affect health contemporaneously, so that those in midlife now can expect to do better in old age as they receive Social Security and Medicare. None of this implies that there are no policy levers to be pulled; preventing the over-prescription of opioids is an obvious target that would clearly be helpful.
我们借鉴并拓展了凯斯和迪顿(2015年)的研究发现,该研究关注了自世纪之交以来美国非西班牙裔白人中年人群中死亡率和发病率的上升情况。全因死亡率持续上升直至2015年,药物过量、自杀及酒精相关肝脏疾病导致的死亡率进一步增加,尤其是在高中及以下学历人群中。心脏病死亡率的下降速度减缓,最近甚至停止,这与其他三种死因共同导致了全因死亡率的上升。不仅白人在死亡率方面的教育差异在增大,而且从1998年到2015年,未获得大学学位者和获得大学学位者的死亡率都有所上升。对于35 - 39岁至55 - 59岁的所有五个年龄段的非西班牙裔白人男性和女性来说都是如此。黑人和西班牙裔的死亡率持续下降;1999年,仅拥有高中学历的50 - 54岁非西班牙裔白人的死亡率比同年龄组黑人的死亡率高30%,但无论教育程度如何;到2015年,这一差距扩大到了30%。在25 - 29岁至60 - 64岁的所有年龄组中都存在类似的交叉情况。可比富裕国家的死亡率继续以美国过去的速度在千年之前的水平上下降。与美国形成对比的是,欧洲教育程度较低人群的死亡率在下降,并且在此期间下降幅度比教育程度较高人群的死亡率更大。许多评论家认为,死亡率不佳的结果可归因于同期的资源水平,特别是缓慢增长、停滞甚至下降的收入;我们评估了这种可能性,但发现它无法提供全面的解释。特别是,死亡率下降的黑人和西班牙裔的收入状况并不比白人更好。欧洲的数据中也没有任何证据表明死亡率趋势与收入趋势相匹配,尽管大衰退后各国的中位数收入模式差异很大。我们提出了一个初步但合理的说法,即从一个出生队列到下一个队列,在劳动力市场、婚姻和生育结果以及健康方面的变化,是由教育程度较低的白人进入劳动力市场时日益恶化的就业机会引发的。这个说法与许多数据相符,具有深刻的负面含义,即政策,即使是那些成功提高收入和就业机会或重新分配收入的政策,也需要很多年才能扭转死亡率和发病率的上升趋势,而且现在处于中年的人在老年时可能比目前65岁以上的人情况更糟。这与一种观点形成对比,即资源会同时影响健康,因此现在处于中年的人随着领取社会保障和医疗保险,老年时有望情况更好。这并不意味着没有政策杠杆可发挥作用;防止阿片类药物的过度处方是一个明显的目标,显然会有所帮助。