University of Toronto, Department of Psychology, 100 St George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada.
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
A long line of research has shown that vision and memory are closely linked, such that particular eye movement behaviour aids memory performance. In two experiments, we ask whether the positive influence of eye movements on memory is primarily a result of overt visual exploration during the encoding or the recognition phase. Experiment 1 allowed participants to free-view images of scenes, followed by a new-old recognition memory task. Exploratory analyses found that eye movements during study were predictive of subsequent memory performance. Importantly, intrinsic image memorability does not explain this finding. Eye movements during test were only predictive of memory within the first 600 ms of the trial. To examine whether this relationship between eye movements and memory is causal, Experiment 2 manipulated participants' ability to make eye movements during either study or test in a new-old recognition task. Participants were either encouraged to freely explore the scene in both the study and test phases, or had to refrain from making eye movements in either the test phase, the study phase, or both. We found that hit rate was significantly higher when participants moved their eyes during the study phase, regardless of what they did in the test phase. False alarm rate, on the other hand, was affected only by eye movements during the test phase: it decreased when participants were encouraged to explore the scene. Taken together, these results reveal a dissociation of the role of eye movements during the encoding and recognition of scenes. Eye movements during study are instrumental in forming memories, and eye movements during recognition support the judgment of memory veracity.
一系列的研究表明,视觉和记忆密切相关,特定的眼球运动行为有助于提高记忆表现。在两项实验中,我们探讨了眼球运动对记忆的积极影响主要是由于在编码或识别阶段的显性视觉探索,还是由于其他原因。实验 1 允许参与者自由观看场景图像,然后进行新-旧识别记忆任务。探索性分析发现,在学习过程中的眼球运动与随后的记忆表现有关。重要的是,内在图像可记忆性并不能解释这一发现。在测试过程中的眼球运动仅在试验的前 600 毫秒内对记忆具有预测作用。为了检验眼球运动和记忆之间的这种关系是否具有因果关系,实验 2 在新-旧识别任务中操纵了参与者在学习或测试期间进行眼球运动的能力。参与者要么在学习和测试阶段都被鼓励自由探索场景,要么要么在测试阶段、学习阶段或两个阶段都被禁止进行眼球运动。我们发现,当参与者在学习阶段移动眼睛时,击中率显著提高,而无论他们在测试阶段做什么。错误警报率仅受到测试阶段眼球运动的影响:当参与者被鼓励探索场景时,它会降低。综合这些结果,揭示了场景的编码和识别过程中眼球运动作用的分离。学习过程中的眼球运动对于形成记忆至关重要,而识别过程中的眼球运动则有助于判断记忆的真实性。