• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按年龄组对结直肠癌患者转移模式的比较:一项基于人群的研究。

Comparisons of metastatic patterns of colorectal cancer among patients by age group: a population-based study.

作者信息

Yang Lin, Yang Xingli, He Wenzhuo, Liu Shousheng, Jiang Chang, Xie Kunqian, Peng Kunwei, You Yafei, Zhang Bei, Xia Liangping

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Dec 28;10(12):4107-4119. doi: 10.18632/aging.101700.

DOI:10.18632/aging.101700
PMID:30594909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6326680/
Abstract

Population-based evaluations of the incidence of metastatic colorectal cancer at diagnosis among different age groups are lacking. Therefore, we investigated the effects of age at diagnosis on metastatic colorectal cancer and patients' prognoses. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor survival. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival differences between the subgroups. We identified 30,333 adult patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2014. The younger and middle-aged groups had better survival than the older group when brain metastasis was not involved. The liver was the most common site of metastasis followed by the liver and lung combined. Age at diagnosis was an independent factor in patients' survival. Survival differences between two and three-sites of metastases were found in the middle-aged and older groups but not in the younger group. No survival differences between three and four sites of metastases were found in any of the age groups. Therefore, the incidence and prognosis of metastatic sites for metastatic colorectal cancer varied by age group.

摘要

目前缺乏针对不同年龄组在诊断时转移性结直肠癌发病率的基于人群的评估。因此,我们研究了诊断时的年龄对转移性结直肠癌及患者预后的影响。利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库来识别被诊断为转移性结直肠癌的患者。进行多变量Cox回归分析以确定与生存不良相关的因素。采用Kaplan-Meier分析来估计亚组之间的生存差异。我们识别出了2010年至2014年间30333例被诊断为转移性结直肠癌的成年患者。在不涉及脑转移的情况下,年轻和中年组的生存率高于老年组。肝脏是最常见的转移部位,其次是肝脏和肺联合转移。诊断时的年龄是影响患者生存的一个独立因素。在中年组和老年组中发现了两处和三处转移部位之间的生存差异,但在年轻组中未发现。在任何年龄组中,三处和四处转移部位之间均未发现生存差异。因此,转移性结直肠癌转移部位的发病率和预后因年龄组而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/0190a39d17fd/aging-10-101700-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/1460214be8fd/aging-10-101700-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/2fe7058f43ba/aging-10-101700-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/0190a39d17fd/aging-10-101700-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/1460214be8fd/aging-10-101700-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/2fe7058f43ba/aging-10-101700-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d51/6326680/0190a39d17fd/aging-10-101700-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparisons of metastatic patterns of colorectal cancer among patients by age group: a population-based study.按年龄组对结直肠癌患者转移模式的比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Dec 28;10(12):4107-4119. doi: 10.18632/aging.101700.
2
Survival differences in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and with single site metastatic disease at initial presentation: results from South Australian clinical registry for advanced colorectal cancer.初诊时转移性结直肠癌患者和单部位转移性疾病患者的生存差异:来自南澳大利亚高级结直肠癌临床登记处的结果。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2012 Dec;11(4):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
The prognosis of different distant metastases pattern in prostate cancer: A population based retrospective study.前列腺癌不同远处转移模式的预后:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Prostate. 2018 May;78(7):491-497. doi: 10.1002/pros.23492. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Prognostic Value of the Site of Distant Metastasis and Surgical Interventions in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study.远处转移部位和手术干预对转移性胃癌预后的价值:一项基于人群的研究。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820964131. doi: 10.1177/1533033820964131.
5
The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis.基于人群的分析:晚期肝癌患者不同转移模式的预后分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 13;13(8):e0200909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200909. eCollection 2018.
6
Prognostic Significance of Sites of Visceral Metastatic Disease in Prostate Cancer: A Population-based Study of 12,180 Patients.前列腺癌内脏转移部位对预后的影响:基于 12180 例患者的人群研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Aug;17(4):260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
7
How do organ-specific metastases affect prognosis and surgical treatment for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma: first evidence from population based data.器官特异性转移如何影响转移性上尿路上皮癌患者的预后和手术治疗:来自人群数据的首个证据。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2017 Dec;34(8):467-477. doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9884-z. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
8
Distant metastases in colorectal carcinoma: A proposal for a new M1 subclassification.结直肠癌的远处转移:一种新的M1亚分类方案
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.034. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Colorectal cancer: Metastases to a single organ.结直肠癌:转移至单一器官。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 7;21(41):11767-76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11767.
10
The incidence and outcome of brain metastases after liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases.结直肠癌肝转移术后脑转移的发生率和转归。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):721-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02762.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective review of clinical outcomes.评估立体定向放射治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效:临床结果的回顾性分析
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2025;9(3):237-243.
2
Construction of a prognostic prediction model for colorectal cancer based on 5-year clinical follow-up data.基于5年临床随访数据构建结直肠癌预后预测模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):2701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86872-5.
3
Metastasis patterns and prognosis in young gastric cancer patients: A propensity score‑matched SEER database analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Rise of PD-L1 expression during metastasis of colorectal cancer: Implications for immunotherapy.结直肠癌转移过程中 PD-L1 表达的上调:免疫治疗的意义。
J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;18(10):574-581. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12538.
2
Colorectal cancer metastatic disease progression in Australia: A population-based analysis.澳大利亚结直肠癌转移疾病进展:一项基于人群的分析。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;49:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
3
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.结直肠癌统计数据,2017 年。
青年胃癌患者的转移模式和预后:基于倾向评分匹配 SEER 数据库的分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0301834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301834. eCollection 2024.
4
Nomograms for predicting overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with metastasis to the liver, lung, bone, and brain.预测结直肠癌肝、肺、骨和脑转移患者总生存期的列线图。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(12):1059-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01744-5. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
5
Prognostic factors and individualized nomograms predicting overall survival in stage IV rectal cancer patients with different metastatic status: a SEER-based study.不同转移状态的IV期直肠癌患者总生存的预后因素及个体化列线图预测:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Sep;11(9):3141-3155. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-436.
6
Efficacy, safety and prognostic factors in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in a real-world setting.在真实世界环境中,接受三氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的难治性转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效、安全性和预后因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 26;12(1):14612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18871-9.
7
A Prognostic Nomogram of Colon Cancer With Liver Metastasis: A Study of the US SEER Database and a Chinese Cohort.一项关于伴有肝转移的结肠癌的预后列线图:美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库及一个中国队列的研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 26;11:591009. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.591009. eCollection 2021.
8
Nomogram for predicting overall survival in colorectal cancer with distant metastasis.预测结直肠癌伴远处转移患者总生存期的列线图
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01692-x.
9
Hemicolectomy Does Not Provide Survival Benefit for Right-Sided Mucinous Colon Adenocarcinoma.半结肠切除术对右侧黏液性结肠腺癌无生存获益。
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;10:608836. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.608836. eCollection 2020.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Temporal Trends in Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Patients, 1973-2010.1973-2010 年,医疗保险患者中结直肠癌的地理和社会人口统计学差异的时间趋势。
J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):361-370. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12209. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer.结直肠癌转移的模式。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 15;6:29765. doi: 10.1038/srep29765.
6
Dual-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib in treatment-refractory, KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (HERACLES): a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼治疗经治、KRAS 密码子 12/13 野生型、HER2 阳性转移性结直肠癌(HERACLES):一项概念验证、多中心、开放标签、Ⅱ期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):738-746. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00150-9. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Brain metastasis in breast cancer: a comprehensive literature review.乳腺癌脑转移:一项全面的文献综述
J Neurooncol. 2016 May;127(3):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2075-3. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Colorectal cancer outcomes and treatment patterns in patients too young for average-risk screening.对于年龄过小不适合进行平均风险筛查的患者,其结直肠癌的治疗结果及治疗模式
Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;122(6):929-34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29716. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
9
Neutrophils support lung colonization of metastasis-initiating breast cancer cells.中性粒细胞支持转移性乳腺癌起始细胞在肺部的定植。
Nature. 2015 Dec 17;528(7582):413-7. doi: 10.1038/nature16140. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
The role of tumor-associated macrophages in breast carcinoma invasion and metastasis.肿瘤相关巨噬细胞在乳腺癌侵袭和转移中的作用。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Jun 1;8(6):6656-64. eCollection 2015.