Schnaubert Lenka, Bodemer Daniel
University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstrasse 65, 47057 Duisburg, Germany.
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41039-018-0084-x. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
When learning collaboratively, learners interact and communicate transactively. Interventions to foster collaborative learning frequently target such interactive processes and thus may drastically change how learners engage with and thus influence each other. One statistical phenomenon related to collaborative learning is the interdependence of data gained from learners collaborating. Often viewed as a mere statistical phenomenon, on a conceptual level, statistical interdependence is a similarity between learners mainly resulting from the mutual influence learners have on each other while collaborating and is thus closely related to collaborative practices. In this paper, we report data of an exemplary study ( = 82) to illustrate how information on interdependence and within- and between-dyad variance may add to data interpretation. The study examined how providing metacognitive group awareness information during collaboration affects individual learning outcomes. We found indications that the information fosters knowledge gain, but not confidence. Surprisingly, the data revealed different levels of interdependence between conditions, which led us to assume interdependence to be part of the treatment effect resulting from differential collaboration processes. We discuss reasons and implications of varying levels of statistical interdependence and their impact on inferential and descriptive statistics.
在进行协作学习时,学习者会进行互动并进行交互性交流。促进协作学习的干预措施通常针对此类互动过程,因此可能会极大地改变学习者相互参与并相互影响的方式。与协作学习相关的一种统计现象是,从协作的学习者那里获得的数据具有相互依赖性。统计上的相互依赖性通常仅被视为一种统计现象,但在概念层面上,它是学习者之间的一种相似性,主要源于学习者在协作时相互施加的影响,因此与协作实践密切相关。在本文中,我们报告了一项典型研究(n = 82)的数据,以说明关于相互依赖性以及组内和组间差异的数据如何有助于数据解释。该研究考察了在协作过程中提供元认知小组意识信息如何影响个体学习成果。我们发现有迹象表明该信息促进了知识的获取,但并未提升信心。令人惊讶的是,数据显示不同条件之间存在不同程度的相互依赖性,这使我们认为相互依赖性是由不同协作过程导致的治疗效果的一部分。我们讨论了统计相互依赖性程度不同的原因和影响,以及它们对推断统计和描述统计的影响。