• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅仅观看是不够的:通过协作脚本促进基于模拟的学习。

Just watching is not enough: Fostering simulation-based learning with collaboration scripts.

作者信息

Zottmann Jan M, Dieckmann Peter, Taraszow Tatjana, Rall Marcus, Fischer Frank

机构信息

Klinikum der LMU München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Munich, Germany.

Herlev Hospital, Center for Human Resources Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Herlev, Demark.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Aug 15;35(3):Doc35. doi: 10.3205/zma001181. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3205/zma001181
PMID:30186945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6120154/
Abstract

In addition to medical facts, medical students participating in simulation-based training are supposed to acquire general knowledge, e.g. heuristics to cope with critical incidents. While active participation is considered a major benefit of this kind of training, a large portion of students' time is often spent observing peers acting in the simulator. Thus, we instructionally supported learners with a collaboration script (i.e., a set of scaffolds that distribute roles and activities among learners in group learning situations) during observational phases of a simulation-based training. Our script was designed to help learners focus on heuristics and to facilitate more (inter-)active participation. We hypothesised that scripted learners would benefit from the instructional support with respect to individual and collaborative learning processes as well as individual learning outcomes. Thirty-four medical students in their 7 to 12 semester participated in this field study with control group design. The independent variable was the collaboration script (with/without). Four voluntary emergency courses with a full-scale simulator were examined. The acquisition of skills related to Crisis Resource Management (CRM) heuristics was one of the learning goals of these courses. The collaboration script induced learners to perform specific activities during and after each observational phase of the training. Further, the script sequenced the order of activities and assigned roles to the learners. Learning processes were measured on an individual level (by means of notes taken by learners during observational phases) and on a collaborative level (by means of learners' comments). Learning outcomes were measured with pre- and post-self-assessment of CRM skills and a brief video-based CRM skills test at the end of the course. The collaboration script had the expected positive effect on individual and collaborative learning processes, leading to an increased focus on heuristic strategies and increased collaborative activity of scripted learners. There was no evidence that the experimental conditions differed regarding the objective measure of individual learning outcomes. However, self-assessment data revealed that students in the control condition perceived a higher improvement of CRM skills throughout the course. We suggest that our script might have helped learners adjust an illusion of their own competency - such an illusion may have appeared in the control group as a result of processing fluency. Findings suggest that simulation-based training in medical education can be enhanced with additional instructional support in the form of collaboration scripts designed to turn observational course phases into more active and better focused learning experiences.

摘要

除了医学知识外,参与基于模拟训练的医学生还应获取一般知识,例如应对危急情况的启发法。虽然积极参与被认为是此类训练的主要益处,但学生的大部分时间却常常花在观察同伴在模拟器中的表现上。因此,在基于模拟训练的观察阶段,我们使用协作脚本(即一组在小组学习情境中在学习者之间分配角色和活动的支架)为学习者提供教学支持。我们的脚本旨在帮助学习者专注于启发法,并促进更多(相互)积极参与。我们假设,使用脚本的学习者在个体和协作学习过程以及个体学习成果方面将受益于这种教学支持。34名处于7至12学期的医学生参与了这项采用对照组设计的实地研究。自变量是协作脚本(有/无)。研究了四门使用全尺寸模拟器的自愿急救课程。掌握与危机资源管理(CRM)启发法相关的技能是这些课程的学习目标之一。协作脚本促使学习者在训练的每个观察阶段期间及之后执行特定活动。此外,脚本对活动顺序进行了编排,并为学习者分配了角色。学习过程在个体层面(通过学习者在观察阶段所做的笔记)和协作层面(通过学习者的评论)进行衡量。学习成果通过对CRM技能的自我评估前测和后测以及课程结束时基于视频的简短CRM技能测试来衡量。协作脚本对个体和协作学习过程产生了预期的积极影响,使使用脚本的学习者更加专注于启发式策略,并增加了协作活动。没有证据表明在个体学习成果的客观衡量方面实验条件存在差异。然而,自我评估数据显示,对照组的学生在整个课程中感觉CRM技能有更高的提升。我们认为,我们的脚本可能帮助学习者调整了对自身能力的错觉——由于处理流畅性,这种错觉可能在对照组中出现。研究结果表明,医学教育中的基于模拟的训练可以通过以协作脚本形式提供的额外教学支持得到加强,协作脚本旨在将观察课程阶段转变为更积极且更专注的学习体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/5b9c406ca003/JME-35-35-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/161887edf9ae/JME-35-35-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/0e7eb3b7d191/JME-35-35-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/5b9c406ca003/JME-35-35-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/161887edf9ae/JME-35-35-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/0e7eb3b7d191/JME-35-35-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed3/6120154/5b9c406ca003/JME-35-35-g-002.jpg

相似文献

1
Just watching is not enough: Fostering simulation-based learning with collaboration scripts.仅仅观看是不够的:通过协作脚本促进基于模拟的学习。
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Aug 15;35(3):Doc35. doi: 10.3205/zma001181. eCollection 2018.
2
Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands-on training?模拟中的替代学习:它比实践培训更有效吗?
Med Educ. 2012 Oct;46(10):1001-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04344.x.
3
Crossing boundaries in interprofessional education: A call for instructional integration of two script concepts.跨专业教育中的边界跨越:呼吁将两种脚本概念进行教学整合。
J Interprof Care. 2016 Sep;30(5):689-92. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1184238. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Learning crisis resource management: Practicing versus an observational role in simulation training - a randomized controlled trial.学习危机资源管理:模拟训练中的实践与观察角色 - 一项随机对照试验。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016 Aug;35(4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.10.010. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
5
Towards a measurement of internalization of collaboration scripts in the medical context - results of a pilot study.迈向医学背景下协作脚本内化程度的测量——一项初步研究的结果
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Aug 17;32(3):Doc32. doi: 10.3205/zma000974. eCollection 2015.
6
Virtual patients in the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills: does presentation mode matter? A quasi-randomized controlled trial.虚拟患者在临床推理技能获取中的作用:呈现方式重要吗?一项类随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1004-2.
7
On the road to becoming a responsible leader: A simulation-based training approach for final year medical students.在成为负责任领导者的道路上:一种针对医学专业最后一年学生的基于模拟的培训方法。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 15;34(3):Doc34. doi: 10.3205/zma001111. eCollection 2017.
8
Fostering medical students' clinical reasoning by learning from errors in clinical case vignettes: effects and conditions of additional prompting procedures to foster self-explanations.从临床病例情景中学习错误来培养医学生的临床推理能力:促进自我解释的额外提示程序的效果和条件。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 May;24(2):331-351. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-09870-5. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
9
Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: A comparative study of observer and participant experiences during an interprofessional simulation training.通过观察学习与通过实践学习:跨专业模拟培训中观察者与参与者体验的比较研究。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jan;31(1):51-58. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1233390. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
How do different goals affect students' internal collaboration script configurations? Results of an epistemic network analysis study.不同的目标如何影响学生的内部协作脚本配置?一项认知网络分析研究的结果。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1410152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410152. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
FINCA - a conceptual framework to improve interprofessional collaboration in health education and care.FINCA——一个用于改善健康教育与护理领域跨专业协作的概念框架。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 2;10:1213300. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1213300. eCollection 2023.
2
Measured task load in directed observers versus active participants undergoing high-fidelity simulation education in a critical care setting.在重症监护环境中,对直接观察者与参与高保真模拟教育的主动参与者的任务负荷进行测量。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10894. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10894. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Randomised controlled monocentric trial to compare the impact of using professional actors or peers for communication training in a competency-based inverted biochemistry classroom in preclinical medical education.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of active (hot-seat) versus observer roles during simulation-based training on stress levels and non-technical performance: a randomized trial.基于模拟训练中主动(热座)角色与观察者角色对压力水平和非技术表现的影响:一项随机试验。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Mar 20;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0040-7. eCollection 2017.
2
Promoting Learning and Patient Care Through Shared Reflection: A Conceptual Framework for Team Reflexivity in Health Care.通过共享反思促进学习与患者护理:医疗保健中团队反思性的概念框架
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11):1555-1563. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001688.
3
More Than One Way to Debrief: A Critical Review of Healthcare Simulation Debriefing Methods.
随机对照单中心试验,比较在临床前医学教育中基于能力的颠倒生物化学课堂中使用专业演员或同行进行沟通培训的影响。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 26;12(5):e050823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050823.
4
Radiation oncology as part of medical education-current status and possible digital future prospects.医学教育中的放射肿瘤学——现状与可能的数字化未来前景。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Jun;197(6):528-536. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01712-x. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Using simulation to help healthcare professionals relaying patient information during telephone conversations.利用模拟技术帮助医护人员在电话交谈中传递患者信息。
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 12;6(8):e04687. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04687. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students.医学知识和团队合作可预测病例总结陈述的质量,而病例总结陈述是本科医学生临床推理的一项指标。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Nov 15;36(6):Doc83. doi: 10.3205/zma001291. eCollection 2019.
7
Microlearning for patient safety: Crew resource management training in 15-minutes.微学习在患者安全中的应用:15 分钟的机组资源管理培训。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213178. eCollection 2019.
不止一种总结汇报方式:对医疗模拟总结汇报方法的批判性综述
Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148.
4
Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study.医学领域的协作专业知识——来自记忆检索研究的跨领域应用无证据支持
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0148754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148754. eCollection 2016.
5
The learning type makes the difference - the interrelation of Kolb's learning styles and psychological status of preclinical medical students at the University of Erlangen.学习类型产生差异——埃尔朗根大学临床前医学生的科尔布学习风格与心理状态的相互关系
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014 Nov 17;31(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma000934. eCollection 2014.
6
Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.技术增强模拟的汇报:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):657-66. doi: 10.1111/medu.12432.
7
Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.迈向计算机支持的协作学习中的指导脚本理论。
Educ Psychol. 2013 Jan;48(1):56-66. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.748005. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
8
Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands-on training?模拟中的替代学习:它比实践培训更有效吗?
Med Educ. 2012 Oct;46(10):1001-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04344.x.
9
Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice.深化作为社会实践的患者模拟的理论基础。
Simul Healthc. 2007 Fall;2(3):183-93. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180f637f5.
10
Surgical simulators and simulated surgeons: reconstituting medical practice and practitioners in simulations.手术模拟器与模拟外科医生:在模拟中重塑医疗实践与从业者
Soc Stud Sci. 2007 Aug;37(4):585-608. doi: 10.1177/0306312706072179.