Anand Nirmala, Pujar Somashekhar, Rao Sakshi
Assistant Professor (Physiology), KAHER, JNMC, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Associate Professor (Forensic Medicine & Toxicology), KAHER, JNMC, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S73-S78. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
The increasing tutorial size poses every teacher with the problem of student attention and participation; hence, newer strategies are needed to engage adult learners into cooperative learning. This study aims to assess the knowledge gained and retained and perceptions of students using an interactive syndicate learning style tutorial vis-a-vis conventional tutorials.
A quasi-experimental crossover study was conducted wherein students of phase 1 MBBS physiology tutorials were divided into two batches (interactive tutorials involving learning Fishbowl with Fish Battle and Round Robin Brainstorming and conventional didactic tutorials), with 65 students in each over 3 days. In the interactive tutorial group, students were seated in 2 concentric circles, the inner circle engaged in Fish Battle (a seminar followed by rebuttal), whereas the remaining students belonged to the Round Robin Brainstorming (outer circle) group, wherein brainstorming using index cards was carried out and a mind map was prepared, followed by a summary. Both batches underwent the pre- and post-MCQ test followed by the crossover study the subsequent week. For testing retention, an Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) test was conducted after 3 weeks. In the end, 5 physiology tutorial modules were completed.
There was a statistical improvement in the post-test scores (9.7%) gain in the Interactive Tutorial (IT) group as compared with the Conventional Tutorial (CT) group. Of the students, 56% retained the topics after undergoing IT compared with CT. Around (90%) students felt improved conceptual thinking, and 92% felt it encompassed active learning.
Interactive tutorials involving such learning styles facilitate active self-determined learning, develop mutual interdependence, equal representation, and group dynamics as adult learners, and transform them into lifelong critical thinkers.
辅导课规模的不断扩大给每位教师带来了学生注意力和参与度的问题;因此,需要更新策略来促使成年学习者参与合作学习。本研究旨在评估采用互动小组学习风格辅导课的学生相对于传统辅导课所获得和保留的知识以及他们的看法。
进行了一项准实验性交叉研究,其中将医学学士一年级生理学辅导课的学生分为两批(涉及通过“鱼缸辩论”和“循环头脑风暴”进行学习的互动辅导课以及传统的讲授式辅导课),每批65名学生,为期3天。在互动辅导课组中,学生们围坐成两个同心圆,内圈参与“鱼缸辩论”(先进行研讨会,然后进行反驳),而其余学生属于“循环头脑风暴”(外圈)组,在该组中使用索引卡进行头脑风暴并绘制思维导图,随后进行总结。两批学生都参加了课前和课后的多项选择题测试,随后在第二周进行交叉研究。为了测试知识保留情况,在3周后进行了多项选择题测试。最后,完成了5个生理学辅导模块。
与传统辅导课(CT)组相比,互动辅导课(IT)组的测试后成绩有统计学意义的提高(提高了9.7%)。在接受IT辅导的学生中,56%的学生在接受辅导后保留了所学主题,而接受CT辅导的学生这一比例为[此处原文未提及CT组的具体比例]。大约90%的学生认为概念性思维得到了改善,92%的学生认为这种辅导课包含了主动学习。
涉及此类学习风格的互动辅导课有助于促进积极的自主学习,培养成年学习者的相互依存、平等参与和团队活力,并将他们转变为终身批判性思考者。