• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间权衡值是否完全捕捉到与健康相关选择相关的态度?

Do time trade-off values fully capture attitudes that are relevant to health-related choices?

机构信息

Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(4):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1017-8. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-018-1017-8
PMID:30596209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6517563/
Abstract

Previous research has shown that demographics, beliefs, and self-reported own health influence TTO values. Our hypothesis is that attitudes towards length and quality of life influence TTO values, but should no longer affect a set of related choices that are based on respondents' own TTO scores. A representative sample of 1339 respondents was asked their level of agreement to four statements relating to the importance of quality and length of life. Respondents then went on to value 4 EQ-5D 5L states using an online interactive survey and a related set of 6 pairwise health-related choice questions, set up, so that respondents should be indifferent between choice options. We explored the impact of attitudes using regression analysis for TTO values and a logit model for choices. TTO values were correlated with the attitudes and were found to have a residual impact on the choices. In particular, those respondents who preferred quality of life over length of life gave less weight to the differences in years and more weight to differences in quality of life in these choice. We conclude that although the TTO responses reflect attitudes, these attitudes continue to affect health-related choices.

摘要

先前的研究表明,人口统计学特征、信仰和自我报告的健康状况会影响 TTO 值。我们的假设是,对生命长度和质量的态度会影响 TTO 值,但不应再影响基于受访者自身 TTO 得分的一组相关选择。我们对 1339 名受访者进行了代表性调查,询问他们对与生命质量和长度的重要性相关的四项陈述的同意程度。然后,受访者通过在线互动调查和一组相关的 6 个基于健康的成对选择问题来评估 4 个 EQ-5D 5L 状态,这些选择问题的设置应使受访者在选择选项之间保持中立。我们使用回归分析研究了 TTO 值的态度影响,使用对数模型研究了选择的态度影响。TTO 值与态度相关,并对选择有残留影响。特别是那些更看重生命质量而非长度的受访者,在这些选择中,他们对年限差异的重视程度较低,对生活质量差异的重视程度较高。我们得出的结论是,尽管 TTO 反应反映了态度,但这些态度仍会影响与健康相关的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/99687cbe9616/10198_2018_1017_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/0e755b3a9e31/10198_2018_1017_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/1a6fbae580c8/10198_2018_1017_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/d8a236f5556c/10198_2018_1017_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/99687cbe9616/10198_2018_1017_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/0e755b3a9e31/10198_2018_1017_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/1a6fbae580c8/10198_2018_1017_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/d8a236f5556c/10198_2018_1017_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed13/6517563/99687cbe9616/10198_2018_1017_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do time trade-off values fully capture attitudes that are relevant to health-related choices?时间权衡值是否完全捕捉到与健康相关选择相关的态度?
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(4):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1017-8. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
2
Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?使用时间权衡法和离散选择实验法评估健康:维度顺序会影响健康状态值吗?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.基于DCE和/或TTO数据的价值集比较:日本EQ-5D-5L健康状态评分
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.EQ-5D-5L 估值技术的重测信度:综合时间权衡和离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1243-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
5
"Back to the future": Influence of beliefs regarding the future on TTO answers.“回到未来”:关于未来的信念对时间权衡法答案的影响
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 12;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0402-6.
6
Using the Choice Sequence in Time Trade-Off as Discrete Choices: Do the Two Stories Match?采用时间权衡法中的选择序列作为离散选择:两种说法是否一致?
Value Health. 2020 Apr;23(4):487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Utility assessment in patients with mental disorders: validity and discriminative ability of the time trade-off method.精神障碍患者的效用评估:时间权衡法的有效性和区分能力。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(5):405-19. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927050-00005.
8
Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.评估研究中引入排序任务是否能提高数据质量并减少不一致性?以EQ-5D-5L为例。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):478-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Exploring Differences between TTO and DCE in the Valuation of Health States.探索时间权衡法(TTO)与离散选择实验法(DCE)在健康状态估值方面的差异。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):273-284. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16668343. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
Thirty down, only ten to go?! Awareness and influence of a 10-year time frame in TTO.已完成30项,只剩10项了?!对TTO中10年时间框架的认知与影响
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):377-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0495-5. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for health-related quality of life: do they vary by age? A systematic literature review on the EQ-5D measure.健康相关生活质量的偏好:它们会因年龄而异吗?关于EQ-5D量表的系统文献综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01766-7.
2
Comparison of health-related quality of life in atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, pemphigus and psoriasis.特应性皮炎、化脓性汗腺炎、天疱疮和银屑病患者健康相关生活质量的比较。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 18;317(1):291. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03786-4.
3
What Makes the Time Tradeoff Tick? A Sociopsychological Explanation.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Differences between TTO and DCE in the Valuation of Health States.探索时间权衡法(TTO)与离散选择实验法(DCE)在健康状态估值方面的差异。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):273-284. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16668343. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
"Back to the future": Influence of beliefs regarding the future on TTO answers.“回到未来”:关于未来的信念对时间权衡法答案的影响
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 12;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0402-6.
3
Exploring a new method for deriving the monetary value of a QALY.探索一种推导质量调整生命年货币价值的新方法。
时间权衡的关键是什么?一种社会心理学解释。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Nov;44(8):974-985. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241286477. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Time trade-off health state utility values for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.时间权衡健康状态效用值在抑郁中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03253-5. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;17(7):801-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0722-9. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
4
"Married with children" the influence of significant others in TTO exercises.“已婚有子女”对时间权衡法练习中重要他人的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 2;13:94. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0276-7.
5
Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods.时间权衡:一种方法,多种方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x.
6
Comparing EQ-5D valuation studies: a systematic review and methodological reporting checklist.比较EQ-5D评估研究:系统评价与方法学报告清单
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):8-20. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13480852. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
7
A direct method for measuring discounting and QALYs more easily and reliably.一种更简单、更可靠的直接测量折扣和 QALYs 的方法。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):583-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12451654. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
8
Time trade-off and attitudes toward euthanasia: implications of using 'death' as an anchor in health state valuation.时间权衡与安乐死态度:将“死亡”用作健康状况估值锚点的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):705-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0192-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
Valuing EQ-5D using time trade-off in France.使用时间权衡法在法国评估 EQ-5D 量表。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Feb;14(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0351-x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
10
The way that you do it? An elaborate test of procedural invariance of TTO, using a choice-based design.你是怎么做的?采用基于选择的设计,对 TTO 的程序不变性进行了精心测试。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Aug;13(4):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0318-y. Epub 2011 May 15.