iBMG/iMTA, Erasmus University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x.
There is no scientific consensus on the optimal specification of the time trade-off (TTO) task. As a consequence, studies using TTO to value health states may share the core element of trading length of life for quality of life, but can differ considerably on many other elements. While this pluriformity in specifications advances the understanding of TTO from a methodological point of view, it also results in incomparable health state values. Health state values are applied in health technology assessments, and in that context comparability of information is desired. In this article, we discuss several alternative specifications of TTO presented in the literature. The defining elements of these specifications are identified as being either methodological, procedural or analytical in nature. Where possible, it is indicated how these elements affect health state values (i.e., upward or downward). Finally, a checklist for TTO studies is presented, which incorporates a list of choices to be made by researchers who wish to perform a TTO task. Such a checklist enables other researchers to align methodologies in order to enhance the comparability of health state values.
关于时间权衡(TTO)任务的最佳规范,目前尚无科学共识。因此,使用 TTO 来评估健康状况的研究可能具有共同的核心要素,即权衡生命长度和生活质量,但在许多其他要素上可能存在较大差异。虽然这种规范的多样性从方法论角度推进了对 TTO 的理解,但也导致了不可比的健康状况值。健康状况值被应用于卫生技术评估,在这种背景下,人们希望信息具有可比性。本文讨论了文献中提出的几种 TTO 的替代规范。确定这些规范的定义要素是方法学、程序或分析性质的。在可能的情况下,指出了这些要素如何影响健康状况值(即向上或向下)。最后,提出了 TTO 研究的检查表,其中包含希望进行 TTO 任务的研究人员需要做出的一系列选择。这样的检查表使其他研究人员能够调整方法,以提高健康状况值的可比性。