Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington , Seattle, WA , USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Washington , Seattle, WA , USA.
J Interprof Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;33(5):481-489. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1560248. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
Effective delivery of healthcare is highly interdependent within and between interprofessional (IP) care teams and the patients they serve. This is particularly true for complex health conditions such as advanced heart failure (AHF). Our Academic Practice Partnership received funding to carry out IP workforce development with inpatient AHF care teams. Our objectives were to (a) identify challenges in team functioning that affected communication and relationships among the AHF care teams, (b) collaboratively identify a focal work process in need of improvement, and (c) test whether facilitated the implementation of team training and work process changes would lead to improvements in team communication, relationships, and process outcomes. The health-care team identified implementation of structured IP bedside rounds (SIBR) as the preferred approach to improving collaborative care. Utilizing a cross-sectional pre/post design, changes in team communication and relationships before and after a team intervention that included TeamSTEPPS training and SIBR implementation, were assessed using a validated Relational Coordination (RC) survey. The study population included AHF care team members (n ~ 100) representing seven workgroups (e.g., nurses, pharmacists) from two inpatient cardiology units at a 450-bed academic medical center in the Pacific Northwest during 2015-2016. Improvements in RC scores were demonstrated across all seven RC dimensions from baseline (Year 1) to follow-up (Year 2). Percent change on each of the seven dimensions ranged from 3.57% to 9.85%. Changes were statistically significant for improvements between baseline and follow-up on all but one of the seven RC dimensions (shared knowledge). The IP team intervention was associated with improvements in RC from baseline to follow-up. Additional research is needed to assess patient perspectives and outcomes of the IP team intervention. Findings of this study are consistent with the growing body of RC and SIBR research and provide a useful model of an IP team-based intervention in clinical practice.
医疗保健的有效提供在跨专业(IP)护理团队内部和之间以及他们所服务的患者之间高度相互依存。对于复杂的健康状况,如晚期心力衰竭(AHF),尤其如此。我们的学术实践伙伴关系获得了资金,用于与住院 AHF 护理团队一起开展 IP 劳动力发展。我们的目标是:(a)确定影响 AHF 护理团队之间沟通和关系的团队功能挑战;(b)共同确定需要改进的重点工作流程;(c)测试是否促进了团队培训和工作流程的变化实施将导致团队沟通、关系和流程结果的改善。医疗保健团队确定实施结构化 IP 床边查房(SIBR)是改善协作护理的首选方法。利用横断面预/后设计,在团队干预(包括 TeamSTEPPS 培训和 SIBR 实施)前后,使用经过验证的关系协调(RC)调查评估团队沟通和关系的变化。研究人群包括来自太平洋西北地区的一家 450 床位学术医疗中心的两个心内科住院病房的七个工作组(例如护士、药剂师)的 AHF 护理团队成员(n~100)在 2015-2016 年期间。RC 得分的改善在所有七个 RC 维度上均得到了证明,从基线(第 1 年)到随访(第 2 年)。七个维度中的每个维度的百分比变化范围为 3.57%至 9.85%。除了一个维度(共享知识)外,所有七个 RC 维度的基线和随访之间的变化均具有统计学意义。跨专业团队干预与 RC 从基线到随访的改善相关。需要进一步研究来评估跨专业团队干预对患者的看法和结果。这项研究的结果与不断增长的 RC 和 SIBR 研究一致,并为临床实践中的跨专业团队干预提供了有用的模型。