Suppr超能文献

乙型肝炎相关肝硬化门静脉高压症:二维剪切波弹性成像对肝脏和脾脏硬度的诊断准确性

Portal hypertension in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: Diagnostic accuracy of liver and spleen stiffness by 2-D shear-wave elastography.

作者信息

Zhu Yu-Li, Ding Hong, Fu Tian-Tian, Peng Shi-Yun, Chen Shi-Yao, Luo Jian-Jun, Wang Wen-Ping

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Hepatol Res. 2019 May;49(5):540-549. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13306. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of liver and spleen stiffness measured by 2-D shear-wave elastography (SWE) in evaluation of clinically significant and severe portal hypertension (CSPH and SPH, respectively).

METHODS

Clinical data of 155 hepatitis B-related cirrhosis patients and their liver and spleen stiffness (L-SWE and S-SWE, respectively) were collected. The diagnostic performances of L-SWE, S-SWE, the liver stiffness-spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (LSPS) and portal hypertension risk score were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients were eligible for analysis. Clinically significant and severe PH were detected in 84 and 74 patients, respectively. Liver and spleen stiffness were significantly correlated with hepatic venous pressure gradient in overall, CSPH, and SPH groups (r  = 0.607, 0.554, and 0.412; r  = 0.665, 0.566, and 0.467, respectively; all P < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of L-SWE, S-SWE, LSPS, and PH risk score were 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.55-0.97), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.51-0.96), and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.88) for CSPH, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.51-0.93), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.59-0.96), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58-0.98), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.59-0.93) for SPH. The best cut-off of L-SWE for determining CSPH and SPH were 16.1 kPa (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 72%) and 23.5 kPa (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 79%). For S-SWE, the best cut-offs were 25.3 kPa (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 79%) and 33.4 kPa (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 70%). A cut-off of L-SWE <13.2 kPa or S-SWE <23.2 kPa was able to rule out CSPH, whereas a cut-off of L-SWE >24.9 kPa or S-SWE >34.2 kPa was able to rule in CSPH.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver and spleen stiffness measured by 2-D SWE are reliable and promising non-invasive parameters to assess CSPH and SPH.

摘要

目的

评估二维剪切波弹性成像(SWE)测量的肝脏和脾脏硬度在评估临床显著性门静脉高压和严重门静脉高压(分别为CSPH和SPH)中的诊断准确性。

方法

收集155例乙型肝炎相关肝硬化患者的临床资料及其肝脏和脾脏硬度(分别为L-SWE和S-SWE)。评估L-SWE、S-SWE、肝脏硬度-脾脏直径与血小板比值评分(LSPS)和门静脉高压风险评分的诊断性能。

结果

104例患者符合分析条件。分别在84例和74例患者中检测到临床显著性门静脉高压和严重门静脉高压。在总体、CSPH和SPH组中,肝脏和脾脏硬度与肝静脉压力梯度显著相关(r分别为0.607、0.554和0.412;r分别为0.665、0.566和0.467;均P<0.05)。L-SWE、S-SWE、LSPS和门静脉高压风险评分在CSPH的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.72(95%置信区间[CI],0.49-0.95)、0.81(95%CI,0.55-0.97)、0.76(95%CI,0.51-0.96)和0.73(95%CI,0.55-0.88),在SPH中分别为0.77(95%CI,0.51-0.93)、0.85(95%CI,0.59-0.96)、0.80(95%CI,0.58-0.98)和0.80(95%CI,0.59-0.93)。确定CSPH和SPH的L-SWE最佳截断值分别为16.1kPa(敏感性,78%;特异性,72%)和23.5kPa(敏感性,81%;特异性,79%)。对于S-SWE,最佳截断值分别为25.3kPa(敏感性,85%;特异性,79%)和33.4kPa(敏感性,74%;特异性,70%)。L-SWE<13.2kPa或S-SWE<23.2kPa的截断值能够排除CSPH,而L-SWE>24.9kPa或S-SWE>34.2kPa的截断值能够确诊CSPH。

结论

二维SWE测量的肝脏和脾脏硬度是评估CSPH和SPH可靠且有前景的无创参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验