经导管二尖瓣置换术(TMVR)的复杂性以及它与经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)不同的原因。
Complexities of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) and why it is not transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
作者信息
Wyler von Ballmoos Moritz C, Kalra Ankur, Reardon Michael J
机构信息
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
出版信息
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov;7(6):724-730. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.10.06.
Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is currently being investigated as a procedural alternative to surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR). Early data from first-in-man trials with current devices suggest that TMVR is technically feasible but carries a high mortality. This is substantially different from the early success transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has seen and is related to complexities of the mitral valve anatomy, differences in pathology that require mitral valve replacement as well as the impact that mitral valve replacement has on physiology and cardiac function, irrespective of the modality by which the mitral valve is replaced. Importantly, in the case of TAVR, a less invasive method is offered to accomplish the same as the traditional surgical intervention. On the other hand, valve replacement is not the recommended treatment option for the majority of mitral valve disease, and in fact is avoided whenever possible during surgery given the shortened life expectancy and increased morbidity with mitral valve replacement. Another distinction between TAVR and TMVR is the etiology and natural progression of the underlying disease and driving factors for intervention that are vastly different between aortic and mitral valve disease. The primary aortic disease treated has been aortic stenosis, which has several etiologic factors that cause a similar physiologic dysfunction and risk. Aortic valve replacement leads to improved survival and quality of life. The primary mitral valve disease targeted is regurgitation, which occurs as a primary valve defect and as a secondary consequence of ventricular dysfunction. Primary mitral regurgitation is treated by valve repair with excellent long-term outcomes. Secondary regurgitation has poor long-term outcomes with current commonly used repair techniques and limited data exists showing that correction of the regurgitation improves survival. Adoption of TMVR will require overcoming the anatomic challenges as well as generating data that supports improved survival and/or quality of life.
经导管二尖瓣置换术(TMVR)目前正在作为外科二尖瓣修复或置换术(SMVR)的一种手术替代方案进行研究。当前设备的人体首次试验的早期数据表明,TMVR在技术上是可行的,但死亡率很高。这与经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)早期取得的成功有很大不同,这与二尖瓣解剖结构的复杂性、需要进行二尖瓣置换的病理学差异以及二尖瓣置换对生理和心脏功能的影响有关,无论二尖瓣置换采用何种方式。重要的是,在TAVR的情况下,提供了一种侵入性较小的方法来完成与传统外科手术相同的操作。另一方面,对于大多数二尖瓣疾病,瓣膜置换并非推荐的治疗选择,事实上,在手术过程中只要有可能就会避免进行瓣膜置换,因为二尖瓣置换会缩短预期寿命并增加发病率。TAVR和TMVR之间的另一个区别是潜在疾病的病因和自然进展以及干预的驱动因素,主动脉瓣疾病和二尖瓣疾病之间存在很大差异。接受治疗的主要主动脉疾病是主动脉瓣狭窄,它有几个导致类似生理功能障碍和风险的病因。主动脉瓣置换可提高生存率和生活质量。靶向治疗的主要二尖瓣疾病是反流,它作为原发性瓣膜缺陷以及心室功能障碍的继发性后果而出现。原发性二尖瓣反流通过瓣膜修复治疗,长期效果良好。继发性反流采用目前常用的修复技术长期效果不佳,而且仅有有限的数据表明纠正反流可提高生存率。采用TMVR将需要克服解剖学挑战,并生成支持提高生存率和/或生活质量的数据。
相似文献
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018-1-1
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019-6-17
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018-10
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016-6
引用本文的文献
J Funct Biomater. 2025-7-7
Struct Heart. 2024-7-31
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2024-11-5
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024-5-15
EuroIntervention. 2023-11-17
本文引用的文献
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018-7-19
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017-11-16
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017-9-30
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016-8
N Engl J Med. 2016-5-19
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015-12-21
N Engl J Med. 2016-1-28