Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.357. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis is becoming more prevalent due to the aging population. Currently, there is no clinical guideline to clarify the utility of repeat MRI in patients with lumbar stenosis, without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniation.
To evaluate the utility of routine use of MRI as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis, and to help formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective radiographic analysis.
Retrospective chart review was performed to review patients with lumbar stenosis, who underwent lumbar decompression without fusion from 2011 to 2015 at a single institution.
Previously established stenosis grading systems were used to measure and compare the initial and the subsequent repeat lumbar MRIs performed preoperatively. If patients were found to have a moderate or severe grade change, and if the surgical plan was altered due to such exacerbated radiographic findings, then their grade changes were considered clinically meaningful.
We identified patients with lumbar stenosis without radiographic instability or neurological deficits, who had at least two preoperative lumbar MRIs performed and underwent decompressive surgeries. At each pathologic disc level, the absolute value of the change in grade for central and lateral recess stenosis, right foraminal stenosis, and left foraminal stenosis from the first preoperative MRI to the repeated MRI was calculated. These changed data were then used to calculate the mean and median changes in each of the three types of stenosis for each pathologic disc level. Identical calculations were carried out for the subsample of patients who only underwent discectomy or had a discectomy included as part of their surgery.
Among the 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37 of those patients had more than one level surgically addressed, and a total of 161 lumbar levels were reviewed. Among the subset of patients that had any grade change, the majority of the grades only had a mild change of 1 (36 out of 42 patients, 85.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.1%-94.1%); there was a moderate grade change of 2 in two patients (4.8%, CI: 0.8%-14.0%), and a severe change of 3 in one patient (2.4%, CI: 0.2%-10.1%). There were three patients with decreased grade change (7.1%, CI: 1.8%-17.5%). All clinically meaningful grade changes were from the subset of patients who had only discectomy or discectomy as part of the procedure. Lastly, both patients that had a clinically meaningful grade change had their MRIs performed at an interval of greater than 360 days.
The radiographic evaluation of the utility of routinely repeated MRIs in lumbar stenosis without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniations demonstrated that there were no significant changes found in the repeated MRI in the preoperative setting, especially if the MRIs were performed less than one year apart. The results of this present study can help to standardize the diagnostic evaluation of lumbar stenosis and to formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis patients.
由于人口老龄化,磁共振成像(MRI)作为腰椎狭窄症的诊断工具的常规使用越来越普遍。目前,尚无临床指南来明确腰椎狭窄症、无不稳定、无神经功能缺损或椎间盘突出患者重复 MRI 的效用。
评估 MRI 作为腰椎狭窄症诊断工具的常规使用的效用,并帮助制定腰椎狭窄症术前影像学合理使用的临床指南。
研究设计/设置:回顾性放射学分析。
对 2011 年至 2015 年在一家机构接受腰椎减压但未融合的腰椎狭窄症患者进行回顾性图表审查。
使用先前建立的狭窄分级系统来测量和比较术前进行的初始和随后的重复腰椎 MRI。如果发现患者有中度或重度分级变化,如果手术计划因影像学恶化而改变,则认为分级变化具有临床意义。
我们确定了没有放射学不稳定或神经功能缺损的腰椎狭窄症患者,他们至少进行了两次术前腰椎 MRI 检查,并接受了减压手术。在每个病变椎间盘水平,从中值术前 MRI 到重复 MRI,中央和侧隐窝狭窄、右侧椎间孔狭窄和左侧椎间孔狭窄的分级绝对值的变化。然后,使用这些变化的数据计算每个病变椎间盘水平三种狭窄类型的变化的平均值和中位数。对仅接受椎间盘切除术或椎间盘切除术作为手术一部分的患者亚组进行了相同的计算。
在没有不稳定、神经功能缺损或椎间盘突出的腰椎狭窄症患者中,对重复 MRI 效用的放射学评估表明,在术前重复 MRI 中未发现明显变化,特别是如果 MRI 间隔不到一年。本研究的结果有助于规范腰椎狭窄症的诊断评估,并制定腰椎狭窄症患者术前影像学合理使用的临床指南。